Essential Utilities, Inc. (WTRG) on Q1 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Essential Utilities Q1 2021 Earnings Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Brian Dingerdissen. Sir, please go ahead. Brian Dingerdissen: Thank you, Katie. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us for our first quarter 2021 earnings call. I am Brian Dingerdissen, Vice President, Head of Investor Relations. And if you did not receive a copy of the press release, you can find it by visiting the Investor Relations section of our website. The slides that we will be referencing and the webcast of this event can also be found on our website. Chris Franklin: Thanks, Brian and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. Let's start out with a look at some of our first quarter highlights. The first quarter marked our one-year anniversary already as essential utilities and the one-year closing of Peoples. We had a strong first quarter. And on a GAAP basis earnings per share was $0.72 for the quarter up 19.6% and Dan will get into the details of that in just a few moments. We invested approximately $178 million in infrastructure improvements through our systems and in the first quarter -- first three months of the year as compared to $172.2 million at the same time last year. Our seven pending acquisitions totaling $450.5 million in purchase price really shows the strength of our municipal acquisition strategy. Also yesterday was our annual meeting of shareholders and I'm pleased to report that all items on the ballot were voted in accordance with management's recommendations. The meeting was also one of transition. Our long-time board member and friend former, CEO Nick DeBenedictis stepped down from the Board to comply with the Board's age policy. And Wendy Franks, who represented CPPIB since the acquisition of Peoples was replaced by Edwina Kelly. Wendy Franks left CPPIB to take another position with a different firm. And we also then expect to add a well-qualified director in the coming months to bring the Board back to nine members again. Dan Schuller : Thanks, Chris and good morning, everyone. We ended the first quarter with revenues of $583.6 million, up about 128% from last year. You'll recall that the Peoples transaction closed on March 16th last year. Therefore, the primary driver of the increase was the addition of the natural gas business from the full quarter, which contributed $315.8 million of revenue growth. O&M increased $125.1 million in the first quarter, up from $106.6 million in the first quarter of last year. Again, this was primarily a result of the addition of the natural gas business and we'll sell-out a little bit more when we talk about the O&M waterfall. Net income was up year-over-year from $51.8 million to $183.7 million and GAAP EPS increased from $0.20 to $0.72. Adjusted income was up from $153.7 million to $183.7 million and adjusted income per share increased 19.6% from $0.60 to $0.72. As a reminder, adjusted income for the first quarter of last year excluded Peoples-related transaction expenses and included a pro forma adjustment for the people's operating results for the period from January 1st to March 15th, 2020 thereby providing a basis for a full year run rate of operating results for 2020. And as a reminder to clarify, there were no adjustments for 2021 for this first quarter. Chris Franklin: Great. Thanks, Dan. And let's switch our topics now to municipal acquisitions. Many of you I think are familiar with this slide as we previously announced six of these municipal acquisitions that have been signed and are pending closing. In April, we signed an asset purchase agreement for $12.5 million for a municipal system in Illinois with approximately 4,000 equivalent dwelling units. Now these seven transactions in total will add close to 231,000 customers or customer equivalents and approximately $450.5 million of rate base when closed. We also have one additional deal in which we have been selected as the winning bidder. We are working to sign an APA and hope to announce that as well in the near future here. Now let's take a moment to discuss DELCORA. You'll recall the county court has twice ruled that our asset purchase agreement with DELCORA is a valid and enforceable contract and has also ruled on the validity of the trust concept. So Delaware County has appealed those decisions to state court. We know that the state court called Commonwealth Court in Pennsylvania and we're awaiting a judge's decision. Given the clarity of the rulings from the County court, we expect a positive decision in state court. Absent a settlement this process typically takes about six months or more. Now let's talk about the regulatory process for DELCORA. Since our last quarterly call, the Pennsylvania public utility commissioners on March 30 vacated the administrative law Judge's recommended decision and remanded the case back to the ALJ to reopen the record and conduct further proceedings based upon recent developments, including settlement agreements reached with all of the municipal interveners in the case. In its remand order, the commission indicated awareness of the county's appeal of the trial court's decision in favor of DELCORA. But then on April 16, the ALJ issued a stay order for the case pending a final and unappealable decision by the State Commonwealth Court. We have since petitioned the commission to review the ALJ's order, as the ALJ order is very clearly inconsistent with the commission's remand directive. And we've asked the commission to clarify its direction to the administrative law judge for the remanded proceeding. All right. As these municipal transactions folks get larger like DELCORA, there is always going to be the possibility of litigation and politics that play a role. We remain focused and patient as we move through the process. We also remain convinced that our solution is best for the DELCORA and Aqua customers and essential shareholders. We will see this to conclusion. All right. As we continue into 2021, we have a healthy pipeline of potential municipal opportunities. This table here includes acquisition opportunities where we are actively engaged in discussions with municipalities. As illustrated on this slide, we are actively pursuing approximately 395,000 customers through acquisition. We continue to believe that fair market value legislation in the eight states where we have water utilities is the main driver of our strong pipeline of opportunities. Also note that fair market value or similar legislation for water and wastewater acquisitions has been passed in the states in which we serve natural gas. West Virginia approved a fair market value legislation in 2020. And last month, the Kentucky governor signed House Bill 465 into law which is similar legislation to fair market value. These favorable regulatory environments are providing their municipalities the opportunity to pursue private capital solutions and infrastructure needs and access to industry experience. So, in closing, I want to reaffirm our guidance for 2021. We expect earnings to be between $1.64 and $1.69 per share. And hopefully, the discussion Dan led, about, how to best think about the quarters was helpful to you. Our capital plans remain on track, as we anticipate spending approximately $1 billion on a regulated infrastructure this year and nearly $3 million -- $3 billion across our Essential platform by 2023. Rate base growth is expected to be 6% to 7% for water and 8% to 10% for gas. And this does obviously does not include acquisitions in the water side. Customer growth is expected to be between 2% and 3% on average, for our regulated water segment. And finally, our ESG targets include a 60% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2035. And with that, I'll conclude our formal remarks. And Kate, if you want to open the line for questions, it would be great. Question-and: Operator: Thank you Sir. Thank you. Our first question comes from Ryan Connors with Boeing and Scattergood. Chris Franklin: Hey, Ryan. Good morning. Ryan Connors: Good morning. Thanks for taking the time. I've got one, kind of P&L question for Dan then, a big picture question for you Chris. Obviously, we're in an inflationary environment here that impacts materials and chemicals and labor and all of the above. Peers have called that out as a headwind, but you don't seem to be experiencing much of that. Dan mentioned actually production cost down, on the water side. And that's your late in the rate cycle in PA anyway. But can you just frame that for us a little bit Dan, why you're not seeing that? And whether you anticipate any cost escalation going forward? Dan Schuller: Yeah, Ryan thanks. And obviously, we're on the lookout for it but we have not seen it yet. And we do have long-term agreements with providers of lots of our materials as well as chemicals. So we expect that, we'll have a little bit of warning before we see increases some of those types of things. But obviously, we're aware of the commodity price increases in the market more broadly. And so, we're on a look forward here. Ryan Connors: And as you're involved in rate matters, I mean do you -- I assume you have to make some more aggressive assumptions maybe in future test years and things like that. How do you think about that? Dan Schuller: Yeah. I mean, we do that. As we go into a future test here, we are looking forward, as what we expect to see in terms of expenses for, specifically the operational expense right so chemicals and power and things like that. Now power we've got long-term agreements in place. Chemicals that's done on a one-year basis, and usually as we go through our budgeting process as we look forward to that subsequent year, which is something we then use ultimately in a rate case filing in future test here, we are getting a read from our chemical providers in terms of what they expect to see as inflationary increases in that subsequent year. So we are -- we will be looking at that, as we go through this budgeting process now for 2022. Ryan Connors: Got it. Okay. And then, my big picture question Chris was, just talk about the municipal acquisition side. Just this past Sunday, there was a very prominent front page above the fold story in the Philadelphia acquirer, biggest newspaper in the state, basically suggesting that there's growing and more organized opposition element to sort of municipal asset sales in Pennsylvania. I think you were quoted in that piece. Can you just kind of give us your -- sum-up, how you think about the issues raised there? And how you strategize against that if in fact there's any reality to that? Chris Franklin: Yeah. It was interesting. Andy made the article, -- who were at the article they spend some time with us. I'm not sure he captured my sentiments as I think about them. One of the things I said to Andy that I thought is, premise was somewhat flawed, in the sense that we had 10 deals signed or closed in last year. And of those 10 if you look at them one-by-one there was only one that had opposition and that was -- that was in DELCORA. Now you could add to that. We did step back from Willistown, but we did that before it came to any kind of a referendum or a flight of some kind. So the way we see it is the volume of transactions are increasing. And so proportionately, we see people voicing their opinions, in the same way. So yes, there's more in the market, more deals in the market. And there's some more opposition. But I wouldn't say that it's disproportionate, I would say, it's growing proportionately. Ryan Connors: Okay. That's fair. And then, lastly, it's good to see Illinois picking up a bit on the M&A front another deal there, but I thought it was kind of unusual that you don't disclose there the name of this town or the system. What's the story behind that? Has that been disclosed locally, or is there some other reason why you're not disclosing that one? Chris Franklin: Yeah. It is unusual, Ryan. And the reason that we're not is -- and we hope to announce it very soon here, but we're finalizing some other associated agreements there. And there are some sensitive things there that we just wanted to wind up before we make a formal announcement and make it public. Obviously, it's very good news and we do have an asset purchase agreement in place. So we want to let the investors know that we've made progress there but it will be a little bit of time before we can get some of the associated agreements signed. That's all. Ryan Connors: Sure. Great. Thanks for your time today. Chris Franklin: Thank you. Dan Schuller: Thanks, Ryan. Take care. Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Durgesh Chopra with Evercore ISI. Chris Franklin: Hey, Durgesh Dan Schuller: Hey, Durgesh Durgesh Chopra: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Chris I must say the picture needs to be updated with facial here on the slides. Chris Franklin: It's already gone. It's already gone Durgesh. Durgesh Chopra: I sat in to hear that, anyways that was my inappropriate earnings call comment. Just – I wanted to see – so there's a back in forth like between the commission and LG and DELCORA. Is there – and you guys were – if I remember this correctly targeting maybe year 2021 flows, it seems like that is going to get pushed. Is there a target there of closing here maybe perhaps in the second half or early next year? Chris Franklin: Yes. I – the guidance, I just kind of provided was that, if it winds through the courts, it could be at least another six months. Now there's always a possibility of a settlement. We've said that all through for this process. But if it winds through the state court, it could be a while again. So we haven't provided an exact date. We have to see, the county has to file a formal brief will be probably in the coming days here. And then the – that clock begins. So best estimate is probably – unless a settlement would probably be sometime next year. Durgesh Chopra: Understood. And then just on the timing of the equity forwards August 10, did I hear that correctly? And is that sort of – are you timing that in accordance with perhaps – or what should we think of that? Dan Schuller: Yes. So Durgesh, the forward agreement way those work is they have a one-year life. So you've got one-year from when you price forward to actually settle that issue the shares and take the cash. So that expires on August 10, 2021 here. So we would expect that we would settle that in the days before the days or weeks before that. We don't need to settle it now but we expect we'd settle it close to that end date if you will. Chris Franklin: And importantly, the dilution associated is already in the numbers for the rest of the year. Dan Schuller: Correct, correct. So you'd see – those shares would be in place from just simply put kind of the middle of August through year-end. That's already in the denominator when we think about our guidance range and the EPS in that guidance range. Durgesh Chopra: Understood. Okay. Appreciate that. So settlement before or around August 10 but it's already incorporated in your 2021 guidance. Perfect. Maybe just one big picture question for you Chris. So clearly, a private market if you, I'm sure you're following very closely the gas LDC multiples and gas asset transactions, right? Clearly, there's a disconnect between the public equity market – valuation market for these assets versus private. Would you consider – or how should we think about like a lot of your electric years have done some part ownership type deals in utilities amongst other things. Is there an opportunity here for you to kind of put a valuation marker of these premier assets in the private market? How do you – how do you guys thinking about that? Chris Franklin: We are really happy with the acquisition of Peoples. The integration has gone extremely well. It's in accordance with our expectations. And is operating even better. And so we are very happy with this combination. We see a long life together and we're going to stay the course. And I think through continued understanding among investors and the public in general that natural gas is here for a very long time. You estimated at least 36% of the energy mix for the next 30 years. We're going to tighten up our system. We're going to operate as environmentally consciously as we can with dropping our footprint by 60% our greenhouse gas footprint by 60%. And we believe this is going to be a strong combination into the future. So we're going to stay the course. Dan Schuller: And I think, Durgesh to add to that we would expect that, if we see private market transactions at that level. We start to see that disconnect – you start to see those converge with public market valuations increasing to that level or toward as well. Durgesh Chopra: Understood. That makes sense guys. Thanks for the time this morning. Appreciate it. Dan Schuller: You bet. Chris Franklin: Take care. Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from in Insoo Kim with Goldman Sachs. Chris Franklin: Hi, Insoo. Insoo Kim: Thank you. Hey, good morning. First question, just on the timing of the equity forward and the H drive game on DELCORA and what that could mean from a closing standpoint, I appreciate the comments on 2021 and what's embedded. When you just look out to 2022 at this point with the recent updates, how much of a potential impact does this have this disconnect in timing and potential delays and just what are some of the offsets that you could do to maintain the five to seven. Dan Schuller: Yes. I guess I'd say, it's a relatively small number of shares relative to our total number of shares today. So, that helps mitigate an impact. And as Chris said, right, we've got six acquisitions coming down the pike here already signed in addition to DELCORA. And so -- and plus a very strong pipeline of additional opportunities beyond that. So, in our decision-making, we just believe it makes good sense to go ahead and do that settlement in August to take those shares to take -- to issue those shares to take the cash. And then, as we go through, as I kind of alluded to, right, there's an annual planning process. We'll be incorporating these shares. Obviously, they're in our five-year plan numbers already for 2022. They'll be in our budget for 2022 as we get to that. And we've got some -- as you know, you manage a business that's got a number of parts and pieces, and can manage it to drive earnings as much as you can and you work to offset any dilution you might have in the business. And we have these other acquisitions to close where we'll put capital to work. Chris Franklin: I think also that, when you think about the increased equity, we are spending $1 billion a year. And so, that's a pretty good clip of capital and we're very mindful about our credit metrics, as Dan said earlier. And so, these things, as Dan said, it's a balance. So, all things in mind, I think it's very prudent to take down the equity here in August or just before. And I think you about talking about the future. Listen, we remain confident that we're going to close DELCORA. As Dan said, we've got a couple of other things in the hopper. But I think we'll stand behind our guidance here. Dan Schuller: Yes, completely agree. Insoo Kim: Got it. Second, just wondering, if there's any updated assessment of cost from the February event? I know we had discussed that in the fourth quarter call, but any color there? And if that impacts not that it would impact 2021 guidance but just giving overall magnitude? Dan Schuller: Yes. So, not a big dollar spend there, about $0.5 million of cost that we look to establish laboratory asset on that kind of takes care of the revenue loss and the operating expenses to resolve the situation there. And then, looking forward from that event, when we did our Root cause analysis and looked at the reason for systems being down, as we said in the last call, it's very much driven by electrical outages. So, electrical outages as opposed to freezing, without the outage, we would have continued to be successful in providing our customers with uninterrupted service. There maybe an opportunity there to -- there certainly is an opportunity there and some of the systems do some hardening and make some investment. These aren't huge dollars. In Texas, we're basically in compliance in terms of the number of generators we have, for the systems that we have and to invest in more generators, we really need to buy-in from the PUC kind of in advance saying, we want to ensure that we can generate power if the power is out. But, when you look at a fairly large number of systems across Texas, it's a big number to start putting in lots of generators. So, I don't think that PUC will -- we'd let a do tremendous amount beyond what the PUC allows at this point. Chris Franklin: Yes. We have less than 100,000 customers in Texas, and it would cost us in the range of $41 million to put generators in all these facilities. I just don't see customers willing to pay that number. And I don't see the commission willing to sign up for that many. Probably some place in between what we have meeting today's regulation. And maybe where the hardening that the commission requires for the future, there might be some opportunity to spend capital and harden the system, as Dan said. But, we don't see spending at the level where everything would get its own generators. It's just -- I would call it cost prohibitive. Dan Schuller: Yes. So, maybe a few million dollars, but not tens of millions of dollars. Chris Franklin: Yes. Insoo Kim: Understood. Thank you so much folks. Dan Schuller: Yes. Thank you, Insoo. Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Travis Miller with Morningstar. Dan Schuller: Hey, Travis. How are you? Chris Franklin: Hey, Travis. Travis Miller: Hi, everyone. Wondering if you could give some more thoughts on Kentucky and the legislation there. Is that a place you've historically looked at acquisitions and just not been able to get to work or now with that legislation, is that a strategic area that you might look at more. Chris Franklin: Yes. That's a good question. We have not traditionally looked there, because we didn't have a base there. Now, that we have a base, a utility base there, albeit it's a natural gas base. We do have a management team and a regulatory expertise there and an operational team, as I said, albeit natural gas. But it does give us a base of operations to look for utilities in Kentucky. And yes, I think the short answer is, we are interested in Kentucky, particularly with that legislation. It's a great regulatory state otherwise. And we enjoy operating the gas utility there from an economic standpoint. So, I would look for us to be very active in Kentucky going forward. Travis Miller: Okay. Great. And then at the national level as you think about the infrastructure move and some of the proposals there. Do you think that's an opportunity more in terms of direct CapEx for you guys in your system, or does it possibly open the opportunity for more acquisitions as kind of these municipals face or look at potential for large investment needs or wants? Chris Franklin: Yeah. Listen, my hope is that they would focus more of the infrastructure federal funding on infrastructure on things like separating sanitary and storm sewers, bridges roads that sort of thing, because I think that's really where you can't bring private capital as easily to bear. In water and wastewater, we like to think about the solution as bring low-cost capital to the game here, as well as local rate making. So that combination, I think about almost like a user fee rather than a federal bailout. So to the extent that, those federal dollars would flow for our use, I think that would be useful. To the extent that, it would flow to municipals and give them temporary band aids on some of their massive capital needs. Obviously, that is not as productive. But I really don't see it, having a major impact given the vast bucket of need and the relatively small dollars that are designated here for water and wastewater. Travis Miller: Sure. Okay. Great. I really appreciate the thoughts. Chris Franklin: You bet. Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Jonathan Reeder with Wells Fargo. Chris Franklin: Hey, Jonathan. Dan Schuller: Hey, Jonathan. Jonathan Reeder: Hey, Good morning, Chris and Dan. Dan, first for you did you say the repairs benefit is expected to be $0.18 to $0.20 of Peoples for the full year? And is that consistent with the benefit realized in full year 2020 on a pro forma basis. For some reason, I thought you'd previously indicated it was going to be like $0.08 to $0.12. Dan Schuller: Yeah. That – so Jonathan, I did say, $0.18 to $0.20 for 2021. So you're correct there. But if we think about last year, we didn't have a full year of capital. I do think you're right $0.08 to $0.12 is what we said, when we had the Investor Day in New York, right, before COVID started. So I'd have checked, it's probably at the high end of that. But again, we didn't have the full year. We only had 16 days in the first quarter and then the subsequent three quarters. So less capital was invested that was repair eligible. Jonathan Reeder: Okay. So $0.08 to $0.12 was for 2020 and then having the full year capital gets you up to that $0.18 to $0.20 this year? Chris Franklin: Full year capital with this year's capital program. Yes. Jonathan Reeder: Got you. Okay. Great. Appreciate that. And then just to also clarify the comments around usage trends in Q1, and kind of the full year guidance, if we're to assume call it normal weather for the remainder of the year in terms of both water and gas consumption. Would that put you in the current guidance range, or does the strong Q1 have you trending at or above the upper end? Dan Schuller: I would still say in the guidance range. I mean, I think at some point here right, we'll see more people return to the workplace, we'll start to see less residential usage, more commercial usage, but we may not be the beneficiaries of that commercial usage, right, if we're serving the suburbs and people go back in the city. So I think we kind of come back to what we call normal usage on COVID basis on the water side. And then on the gas side, right, it's so weather dependent. I think the best you can do is sort of kind of normal weather through the remainder of the year. And of course, there's always variability around that. But I would say as I made – as I said earlier, and then I think Chris reiterated it I think that $1.64 to $1.69 guidance range for 2023 that remains intact. And continue to focus on that. Jonathan Reeder: Okay. Awesome. And then maybe this is for you Chris. When do you expect in terms of – respond to your appeal of the ALJ day in the DELCORA docket. Is there? Chris Franklin: Yes 30 days. May 20th is the public meeting that they need to respond by. Jonathan Reeder: And if they – I mean, if they kind of reiterate that, yeah, they didn't want those things stayed, and move forward. Would you think then like the commissions prepared to act before I guess the appeal process plays out? Chris Franklin: That's a question. I don't want to front-run the commissioners. It is a good question. And I think there's a diversity of views among the commissioners. So we'll have to – let's see. We're trying to take these things one step at a time. So let's see what they do on May 20th, and then maybe give a better judgment from there. Jonathan Reeder: Okay. And then last, and I know you're limited as to what you can say in regards to the potential settlement. But do you feel any additional headway has been made in reaching a compromise since say your year-end update in February? Chris Franklin: Yes. I mean all I can say is there's been discussions. I'll just say this and I've said this publicly so I'm so disappointed in the politics being played here. The DELCORA had to raise rates 10% at the end of last year. They'll probably have to raise them again 10% this year if this continues on. We committed in the transaction that we would only raise rates 3% a year. So already these customers are paying a lot more than they really need to. And we continue to ask for -- through a right to know process how much the county is spending on legal fees and they're spending literally millions of dollars on this. And it's a sad commentary on politics over good economics. And so -- but Jonathan we're committed to seeing this thing through. At the end of the day, we think that our contract as I said is valid and enforceable and we plan to take it to the end here. Jonathan Reeder: Okay. Great. I appreciate those responses. Yes. And good luck with DELCORA hopefully we get some movement there and you can get the deal done soon. Chris Franklin: Yes. Thank you. Brian Dingerdissen: Thanks, Jonathan. Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from Verity Mitchell with HSBC. Brian Dingerdissen: Hi, Verity Chris Franklin: Hi, Verity Verity Mitchell: Hi. Good morning. I've got a more general question about your gas business. There's been a lot of focus on water. In one of your previous slide decks you've got a rate of mild for gas rehabilitation. So you've obviously got a step-up in this year and then kind of flat in 2022 and then another step-up in 2023. Are you being conservative, or could you do your gas rehabilitation faster? And therefore spend more. Some comment on that would be interesting. Thank you. Chris Franklin: Yes. I think, I'll give a couple of opening thoughts and then let Dan jump in to Verity. So when you do a gas rehabilitation program the number one thing right is safety. And so depending on where that work is being completed? What it looks like? Is it densely populated city of Pittsburgh? Is it out further in more rural areas? Clearly the complication in the city is difficult right? We're looking at a construction site just this week out there in Pittsburgh and they were moving nine feet a day. That's what - how complicated City Street is. However, out in the more rural area you can move much more quickly. And so the mix of projects is part of the element of what comes to bear here. And as you can imagine what we've tried to do in our capital program is handle those more densely populated areas first and then move into the more rural areas. And so there's a lot of things to consider in that mix. We've estimated about 15 years in total and that will probably vary a little bit in terms of pace throughout that period. But Dan do you think about it in any different way than that? Dan Schuller: No, I think you're right, Chris. And when I'm looking at the same slide now Verity that you're looking at and there is that step-up in terms of mileage. I believe that the -- what underlies that is a move to do more mileage outside the city where it is faster to move those miles. But also very -- the other -- there are a couple of other things to talk about here. One is we do file with the Pennsylvania PUT a long-term infrastructure improvement plan that really outlines the number of miles we intend to replace year-after-year. And you remember as part of the transaction we agreed to increase both the mileage and the dollars investing each year -- invested each year. So we've built that into our filed LTIP program. So I note that there is that sort of plan in place for how we would do it. Another constraint is obviously qualified labor to implement a capital program. And so ramping up a capital program means we need both more crews from outside contractors who are well-qualified to do this, but also a fairly large number of internal resources as well because in the gas business we need internal resources to do the tie-ins and any live gas type of work where we're connecting to customer service lines. So there's a question of ramping up on the resource side as well to try to do this faster. So I would say at this point we think that what we filed in the LTIP and what we're planning to do is it's very much as stated on the slide that you're looking at we'll adhere with that for the time being. Verity Mitchell: Thanks. Its really helpful. Thank you. Dan Schuller: Thanks, Verity. Operator: Thank you. This concludes today's Q&A. I would now like to turn the call back over to Chris for closing remarks. Chris Franklin: Thank you all for joining us today. As always Brian, Dan and I are always available for follow-ups if you needed. Have a great day. Thanks again for joining us. Operator: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect.WTRG Ratings Summary
WTRG Quant Ranking
Related Analysis
Essential Utilities, Inc. (NYSE:WTRG) Earnings Preview and Financial Health
Essential Utilities, Inc. (NYSE:WTRG) is a prominent player in the water supply industry, providing water and wastewater services to millions of customers. As part of the Zacks Utility - Water Supply industry, WTRG has consistently demonstrated strong financial performance. The company is set to release its quarterly earnings on May 12, 2025, with Wall Street analysts estimating earnings per share (EPS) of $0.80 and projected revenue of $690 million.
The upcoming earnings report for the quarter ended March 2025 is anticipated to show a year-over-year increase in earnings, driven by higher revenues. Analysts expect WTRG to report quarterly earnings of $0.80 per share. The stock's movement will largely depend on whether the actual results exceed or fall short of these expectations. A positive earnings surprise could lead to a rise in the stock price, while a miss might result in a decline.
Essential Utilities has a strong track record of surpassing earnings estimates, with an average earnings surprise of 5.11% over the last two quarters. In the most recent quarter, the company exceeded expectations by reporting earnings of $0.67 per share against an anticipated $0.66, marking a 1.52% surprise. In the previous quarter, WTRG delivered $0.25 per share, surpassing the consensus estimate of $0.23, resulting in an 8.70% surprise.
The company's financial metrics provide insight into its market valuation and financial health. WTRG has a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 18.75, indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. Its price-to-sales ratio stands at about 5.38, reflecting the market's valuation of its sales. The enterprise value to sales ratio is around 9.08, while the enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio is approximately 24.59.
WTRG's debt-to-equity ratio is 1.25, suggesting it has more debt than equity, which is a common scenario in the utility sector. The current ratio of 0.50 indicates the company's ability to cover short-term liabilities with short-term assets. The earnings yield for WTRG is about 5.33%, providing a measure of the return on investment for shareholders.
Essential Utilities, Inc. (NYSE:WTRG) Earnings Preview and Financial Health
Essential Utilities, Inc. (NYSE:WTRG) is a prominent player in the water supply industry, providing water and wastewater services to millions of customers. As part of the Zacks Utility - Water Supply industry, WTRG has consistently demonstrated strong financial performance. The company is set to release its quarterly earnings on May 12, 2025, with Wall Street analysts estimating earnings per share (EPS) of $0.80 and projected revenue of $690 million.
The upcoming earnings report for the quarter ended March 2025 is anticipated to show a year-over-year increase in earnings, driven by higher revenues. Analysts expect WTRG to report quarterly earnings of $0.80 per share. The stock's movement will largely depend on whether the actual results exceed or fall short of these expectations. A positive earnings surprise could lead to a rise in the stock price, while a miss might result in a decline.
Essential Utilities has a strong track record of surpassing earnings estimates, with an average earnings surprise of 5.11% over the last two quarters. In the most recent quarter, the company exceeded expectations by reporting earnings of $0.67 per share against an anticipated $0.66, marking a 1.52% surprise. In the previous quarter, WTRG delivered $0.25 per share, surpassing the consensus estimate of $0.23, resulting in an 8.70% surprise.
The company's financial metrics provide insight into its market valuation and financial health. WTRG has a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 18.75, indicating how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. Its price-to-sales ratio stands at about 5.38, reflecting the market's valuation of its sales. The enterprise value to sales ratio is around 9.08, while the enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio is approximately 24.59.
WTRG's debt-to-equity ratio is 1.25, suggesting it has more debt than equity, which is a common scenario in the utility sector. The current ratio of 0.50 indicates the company's ability to cover short-term liabilities with short-term assets. The earnings yield for WTRG is about 5.33%, providing a measure of the return on investment for shareholders.
