Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) on Q1 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
Operator: Good morning and welcome to the Tyson First Quarter Fiscal 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Megan Britt, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Megan Britt: Hello and welcome to the first quarter fiscal 2021 earnings conference call for Tyson Foods. On the call today are Dean Banks, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Stewart Glendinning, EVP and Chief Financial Officer. Dean Banks: Thank you, Megan. We are pleased to have you as a new member of our Tyson Foods family and appreciate your leadership. I want to thank everyone listening for your interest in Tyson Foods, and I want to thank our 139,000 dedicated team members, who come to work every day to help keep each other safe and feed the world. Your work is raising the world’s expectations for how much good food can do. Earlier today, we released our first quarter results for fiscal 2021. We delivered strong operating earnings performance, exceeding $1 billion in operating income for the quarter. This performance was driven by higher earnings in our Prepared Foods, Beef and Chicken segments, and demonstrates our effectiveness in addressing customer and consumer needs, while continuing to manage the ongoing effects of the global pandemic. I am exceptionally proud of our global team for their contributions to the strong results. Fundamental to our results are the considerable investments that we’ve made to safeguard the health, safety and wellness of our global team members. This remains our top priority. We also continue to monitor consumer trends. The pandemic spurred changes in consumer demand patterns and created new operational complexities for our team. We have risen to the challenge that these changes have created. We flexed our footprint to adapt to shifting channel demand, scaling retail production up dramatically, and innovating with attractive retail offerings. Our investments in insights, innovation and R&D are helping us win with consumers. As demonstration, we now have delivered 10 consecutive quarters of retail volume growth across our core business lines. Stewart Glendinning: Thanks, Dean, and good morning, everyone. Starting with Prepared Foods, sales were $2.1 billion for the quarter, roughly flat versus the same period last year, reflecting higher retail and lower foodservice sales. Total volume was down 9%. Segment operating income was $266 million for the quarter, up 48% versus prior year. This substantial improvement in profitability was driven by strong retail performance, lower commercial spending, as a result of continued strength in retail demand, and lapping of issues experienced as a result of our ERP rollout last year. Offsetting these improvements were higher costs related to commodity price increases and other input cost inflation, along with COVID-related costs and impacts on our manufacturing efficiency. As demand gradually normalizes post-COVID, we expect higher levels of commercial spending in order to meet our category growth objectives and negative mix impacts from higher foodservice volumes. As this shift occurs, we expect some benefits from improving fixed cost deleverage as volumes increase back to historical levels. Operating margins for the segment were 12.6% for the first quarter, an improvement of more than 400 basis points versus the comparable period. We’re also happy to see our business operations stabilizing in key areas, which has allowed us to improve our service levels, as well as fill rates with our customers. Moving on to our Chicken segment. First quarter results show an improved operating income relative to the same period last year. Segment sales were $2.8 billion for the quarter, down 14% versus prior year, in large part because of a $320 million reduction in sales from the poultry litigation accrual. Volumes were down 7% relative to the same period last year, primarily due to lost foodservice sales but were offset by bright spots in our retail value-added categories, as well as strong sales to certain national account QSR chains. Sales and volumes continue to be impacted by both, channel shifts and intermittent operational issues resulting from the pandemic, including higher absenteeism at our production facilities. Segment operating income was $104 million for the quarter, up 33% versus the same quarter last year. The operating income improvement was driven by price increases on certain products and cost-saving initiatives as we continue working to improve the competitiveness of our Chicken operations. We also saw a positive impact from derivatives of approximately $70 million in the quarter. Operating margins for the segment improved 90 basis points to 3.3% for the first quarter. We are driving actions in three areas within our Chicken business in order to restore top tier performance, being the employer of choice, improving operational performance and our relentless focus on serving our customers’ needs. Higher levels of absenteeism and turnover have created inefficiency in our operations as they leave us short of team members to fully stop our plants and also drive higher levels of overtime pay. As a result, we’re implementing a range of measures designed to enhance the attractiveness of our production-related roles, including increased pay, and the use of automation and technology to supplement some of the more difficult and high turnover jobs. Next, our process flow in the plant has not been optimal, and we’ve been working steadily to correct this. Clearly, the disruptions caused by COVID have not helped, but we’re starting to see improvement and expect that to continue during the year. This will be the source of considerable savings over time. Lastly, COVID channel shifts and volatile demand have negatively impacted our order fulfillment rates. Changes we’ve made to plant operations in response to COVID are yielding improvements, and we expect that further improvements will result as we reduce our staffing gaps and drive operational flow improvements. This is, of course, in addition to the benefits expected as foodservice begins to recover. Moving to the Beef segment. First quarter results show an improvement relative to the same period last year. Segment sales were approximately $4 billion for the quarter, up 4% versus the same period last year. Key sales drivers include strong domestic and export demand for beef products with volumes up 5.6% for the quarter. Segment operating income was $528 million for the quarter, up 45% versus prior year. Operating income improvement was driven by higher volumes as we lapped the prior year impacts of our Finney County plant fire. We also realized a $55 million gain related to recoveries from the cattle supplier fraud, offset by higher COVID-related operating costs. These higher costs were mostly driven by bonuses paid to our frontline team members. Note also that the comparable period last year was revised down by $68 million, associated with the cattle supplier of fraud, affecting the year-over-year comparison. Operating margins for the segment improved 370 basis points to 13.2% for the first quarter. Now, let’s move on to the Pork segment on slide 14. First quarter results show a softening relative to the same period last year. Segment sales were $1.4 billion for the quarter, up about 4% versus the comparable period last year. These sales drivers for the segment included lower volumes as a result of temporary idling of one of our production facilities, offset by stronger demand. Volumes were down 3% for the quarter relative to the same period last year. Segment operating income was $116 million for the quarter, down 40% versus the comparable period. Operating income degradation was driven by production inefficiencies, the temporary idling of the previously mentioned production facility and COVID-related operating costs. We also experienced higher live animal costs, which was not fully offset by price. Operating margins for the segment declined by 590 basis points to 8.1% for the first quarter. Moving to slide 15. I’ll share the quarterly results impact on certain cash flow and balance sheet metrics. Operating cash flow totaled $1.4 billion, up nearly $500 million versus the prior year. Liquidity strengthened to $4.2 billion as of January 2, 2021. Gross debt to adjusted EBITDA of 2.6 times was down slightly compared to prior year-end. And on a net debt basis, we were at 2 times, aided by the strong cash flows in this quarter. Net interest expense totaled $108 million. Our adjusted effective tax rate was 23.5%. Capital expenditures came in at $289 million. We paid $159 million of dividends during the quarter and purchased $17 million of shares related to our employee stock plans. Turning now to a discussion on our financial outlook. Clearly, an important headline this quarter is the sharp rise in grain costs. Grain futures for 2021 have continued to strengthen due to diminished stocks to use expectations for corn and soybeans, and strong export demand, particularly from China. We expect hedging and pricing actions will allow our team to mitigate some grain cost impacts moving ahead. But, at this time, it is difficult to estimate just how much can be mitigated through those actions. As a reminder, a $0.10 per bushel move in corn price or a $10 per ton move in soybean meal translates into an approximate change of $25 million in cost of goods sold. We’ve also seen some recent inflationary pressure in our freight costs, largely due to a shortage of drivers. In our international and export businesses, these freight dynamics are manifesting themselves through increased container costs. Our team’s efforts to mitigate future freight and transportation risks will continue to ensure our products are shipped efficiently and effectively to meet customer needs. Lastly, looking at our assumptions related to the adequacy of live animal inventory, live cattle inventories remain ample to support our beef business, and we believe hog inventories will remain adequate, despite a small decrease in supply. Having said that, both cattle and hog futures have moved higher since October, and we’re working to minimize the impact to our business, particularly in the Prepared Foods segment where retail prices do not move as dynamically. Slide 17 captures our financial outlook for fiscal 2021. We expect to deliver annual revenues at the top end of our previous range of $42 billion to $44 billion, supported by our strong first quarter performance. We also expect our directional annual guidance versus last year of improved operating margins in Prepared Foods and lower operating margins in Pork to hold. At current grain prices, operating margins in Chicken will likely be lower than prior year. Because of stronger-than-expected performance in Beef and current market conditions, we expect Beef to deliver an operating margin similar to last year’s 10.1% or marginally lower. Key risks to this guidance include rate rates as well as labor availability and costs across all segments, grain costs in the Chicken segment, raw material costs for our Prepared Foods business and continued export market strength. We are revising our capital expenditures outlook to $1.3 billion to $1.5 billion as we continue to build capacity across our network. As we noted last quarter, the majority of this spend will be toward capacity expansions in chicken, case-ready beef and pork, prepared foods and international. Net interest expense is expected to be lower than our previous outlook at approximately $430 million, which reflects a recent term loan repayment of $750 million that occurred during our second quarter. Our outlook on effective tax rate is unchanged, but we will continue to monitor the potential implications of legislation from the new administration. Our expectations related to liquidity are unchanged, although we expect our liquidity to decrease from $4.2 billion at the end of the first quarter, based on the term loan repayment as well as our seasonally higher cash usage during our second quarter. Finally, we have continued to invest in health and safety, and wellbeing of our team members. And our COVID-related costs, which totaled $120 million in the quarter, are now expected to be approximately $440 million for the year. It remains to be seen what portion of these costs will be permanent. Now, I’d like to turn the call back to Dean. Dean Banks: Thanks, Stewart. In summary, our multi-protein portfolio delivered strong first quarter results that will create the fuel for disciplined investments and higher margin, higher growth opportunities ahead, and we will seek opportunities to remove unnecessary costs and invest in the right areas. Our retail performance is showing tremendous strength, and our operational flexibility positions us well for a gradual recovery in foodservice volumes. We remain focused on fostering a culture of health, safety and wellness, and protecting our team members through workplace protections and a leading COVID-19 monitoring program, as well as our vaccine preparations. I’m energized by our team’s commitment to delivering healthy, safe and accessible protein to global consumers, their ability to continuously innovate and their ongoing emphasis on operational execution. We’re optimistic about the continued success of Tyson Foods as our diverse portfolio has us well positioned for long-term sustainable growth. And with that, I’ll now turn the call back to Megan. Megan Britt: Thanks, Dean. We’ll now move to your questions. Please recall that our cautions on forward-looking statements and non-GAAP measures apply to both, our prepared remarks and the following Q&A. Operator, please provide the Q&A instructions. Operator: We will now begin the question-and-answer session. The first question comes from Ben Bienvenu with Stephens, Inc. Please go ahead. Ben Bienvenu: Hi. Thanks. Good morning, everybody. I’ve got two questions. One about guidance, and then, the second kind of bigger picture strategic question. First on guidance. I want to focus in on the Chicken guidance, given that -- I think most of the other elements of your guidance make sense, but I wanted to probe on Chicken. I understand the view around rising grain costs. And I know relatively low stocks to use, that’s going to be a particularly tight environment this year. Let me juxtapose that though with what chicken prices have done year-to-date. I’m curious around what’s embedded in your outlook as it relates to chicken prices for the year relative to grain costs? And then, also relative to last year, which was tumultuous for the industry and for you, you’ve had some unusual charges and costs last year that, in some ways, artificially suppressed your chicken margins. So, maybe talk about that relative to your view and your guidance this morning that Chicken margins will be lower year-over-year. Dean Banks: Sure, Ben. First off, thanks for the question. Thanks for the interest in the Company. As you saw in the slide presentation, we are making substantial investments towards improving the Chicken business overall. First off in being the employer of choice, we’re making investments in operational performance and really getting our fill rates up to ultimately service our customers. Those are not bullets on a slide. Those are actions that are actively taking place. And as we said before, we’re one of the world’s largest chicken businesses. So, it’s going to take some time for those activities to materialize into our operational performance overall. As it relates to pricing, as we’ve said before, a lot of the pricing in the Company happens if the poultry happens in the first and second quarter. We’ve made substantial progress there and are satisfied with how it’s coming together. Ben Bienvenu: Okay. So, when we -- just as a quick follow-up on that. When we look at kind of commodity chicken market, I guess, we need to assume a more tempered impact of the dynamics in that market on your chicken sales prices to square up with your guidance in your release this morning. Is that a fair characterization? Dean Banks: The industry as a whole is certainly facing a number of headwinds with grains, with transportation costs, labor, et cetera. We’re managing those. Some of that’s uncontrollable. We will see -- with vaccinations, we will see foodservice recovery, but its effect on price, I’m not going to project. Ben Bienvenu: Okay. Fair enough. My second question is kind of bigger picture, on the renewable diesel industry and the projected growth in that industry that’s growing rapidly. It’s having even already a pretty meaningful impact on rendered animal fats and rendered animal fats pricing. I know you guys are a large render in the chicken operations. I’m curious, one, how you think you’re positioned relative to that bigger picture structural demand driver? And two, if you can comment on how actively you are involved in being a feedstock provider to any producers? Dean Banks: Sure, a few things there. Rendering is a fantastic part of our business and gives us certainly some improved margins that we can make full use of whatever animals are entrusted into our care. It also gives us a lot of flexibility in production. So, the purchase of API that we made a few years ago has turned out to be great for the business. You may also know that we’ve made an investment in a joint venture with Jacob Stern in our Beef and Pork business to take a lot of the byproduct and make that ready and more ready for renewable diesel. That’s a great partnership and progressing well. We do see strong demand for all of the animal byproducts that could be going into that space, and we think it’s a promising part of the business. Operator: The next question comes from Adam Samuelson of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Adam Samuelson: Yes. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. So, I guess, just continuing on the Chicken business, and I’m just trying to make sure I’m thinking about the moving pieces here properly. Is the outlook, the revised outlook for profit to be down year-on-year, is that solely a function of grain? Is there some of the absorption of the incremental COVID costs? Has your underlying productivity kind of expectations changed in a material way, kind of thoughts on mix? I’m just trying to make sure I understand how the view has evolved since you gave the outlook in November and maybe find your plan in some of those buckets? Dean Banks: Like I said in the previous answer, we are investing heavily in getting that business back on track. And we do expect foodservice recovery to help with some of the historical deleveraging we’ve seen there as we convert business from back to foodservice. Stewart, do you want to add anything? Stewart Glendinning: Yes. That would be great. Look, in the presentation, we shared with you some specifics on where we’re working in Chicken. We wanted you to be clear that we understand where the challenges are and where we are making changes. With respect to the change in forecast, you’re right. I mean, the biggest change is grains. I mean, the change in pricing in grains has been nothing less than enormous. And that is going to weigh on the business. So, that’s a simple -- the easiest answer. Adam Samuelson: Okay. That’s all very helpful. And then, as we think about maybe beyond this year, I’m just -- with the grain environment is what it is, those things will work themselves out one way or the other, either pricing in the industry will move higher over time, or actually will get back into surplus at one day . Help me think, has the view on kind of through-cycle profitability in the Chicken business changed, or how do you think about kind of where the opportunity really is? I mean, the business has had been in a lot of different places from a profitability perspective in the last five, seven years. And I think we’re all kind of struggling to calibrate a little bit where the portfolio is currently structured can really get to in a normal market environment, when it’s executing properly? Dean Banks: Yes. I think, we described before that we do expect the operational improvements that we’re making to materialize in the second half of the year and really, really show up in 2022. Again, with being one of the largest poultry businesses in the world, it takes some time to get those operational improvements back on track. We put Donnie King in place have a very strong team there that are really on top of the things that we know that we need to improve to be where we want to be. The long-term supply demand dynamics in the classic poultry cycles, I’m not necessarily going to comment on. But, I will say that our ability to value up our portfolio into our retail businesses and to add features and attributes that bring new households into our brands and into our poultry business, like you’ve seen with Air Fried are nothing short of exceptional. I think, that gives us a real advantage in the future to expand upon -- to make the business not only competitive, but winning in the space. Operator: The next question comes from Peter Galbo of Bank of America. Please go ahead. Peter Galbo: Maybe to pivot a little bit to Prepared Foods. The slide, I think it’s 15 in the deck is helpful in understanding kind of some of the input costs and understanding that maybe as foodservice comes back, there’s a little bit of a negative mix. But, I wanted to shift the conversation to pricing ability there within Prepared Foods maybe on the retail side, as you’re seeing these levels of inflation. Is there anything you’ve done or anything you’ve seen in your internal research that would say, consumer elasticities are different this time around, whether it’s due to higher savings rates or people being stuck at home, even in a post-COVID world that do you feel like your ability to pass along pricing in Prepared Foods this time might be easier, just given some of the dynamics of the consumer that have changed? And then, I have a follow-up as well. Dean Banks: I would say that we do see higher consumer interest in spending on food. I think, that’s benefited a couple of our businesses. Prepared Foods is one, Beef is another, just very, very strong demand. And again, our flexibility from retail to foodservice is going to allow us to step in and meet consumers wherever they are. Some of the costs that we incur, we can happily pass along to customers, some we can’t, and we do see rising input costs there. But, we’re very, very well positioned with the portfolio to meet consumers where they are and make sure that we’re able to take care of them. Peter Galbo: Okay. And maybe just one on Chicken and maybe to ask Adam’s question in a bit of a different way. Looking at the three kind of pillars you guys have outlined for improving Chicken, I mean, those are all helpful from our perspective. But, I guess, what’s tough is it’s hard for us to view this from an outside perspective and understand if things are actually going right underlying. So, is there any way for us to track how these improvements are going from an external basis or anywhere you would want to steer for us to know that you’re on the right track? Dean Banks: I’d say that what you can do is take a look at our historical financial performance, see where we’re going. A lot of the market indicators related to our retail product performance is indicative of us being able to gain customer traction there. And then, you can probably look back at the historical foodservice performance with some rough estimates and see that when we pick up foodservice, when that volume comes back, and we can pick our volume back up that the operational improvements that we put in place are going to help us deleverage -- or fix the deleverage and operate at a higher level. Operator: The next question comes from Ken Goldman of JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Ken Goldman: Hi. Good morning. And Megan, welcome. I wanted to ask about the Beef guidance improvement. I know, it’s not officially quantitative, but the tone is better. And I just wanted to ask how much of that is from underlying fundamentals getting a little bit better versus the change in comp period results and the gain from your cattle supplier issue. I just wanted a sense of what the underlying, I guess, dynamics are there? Dean Banks: Generally, the dynamics are very good for the business, and the team is managing those dynamics extremely well. There’s very strong demand in really all channels, including exports. And from a supply perspective, it’s really clear that we’ve seen a slight downtick of about 1% in breeder stock, but the cattle supply remains strong for the business. And as we’ve said before, it’s a spread business. So, the operational component, the teams are nailing and the dynamics for the industry are actually looking attractive. Ken Goldman: Thanks. And then, my follow-up is, a little more than 10 years ago, grain prices were even more volatile than they are now, at the time chicken industry reacted in part by changing some of its pricing dynamics. So, I think some agreements went from once a year to maybe adjusting a few times a year. I know you have dozens of pricing mechanisms and agreements, it’s probably understanding it. But in general, do you have the desire, the ability to amend some of your contracts, so when you get a little bit closer to cost-plus across the board in chicken or something effectively like that? I guess, the reason I’m asking is, I think the stocks multiple sometimes is held back by unpredictability. And the more that you not have to worry about grain because there’s an adjustment mechanism for your chicken prices, the but better. Just curious about your thoughts along those lines. Dean Banks: Yes. There’s a variety of mechanisms that we use in managing input costs. We’ve talked about the hedging and forward strategy, where when we sign agreements, we do try to lock in the price for those agreements to fix the margin. As it relates to market pricing, as we’ve described before, there is a lot of different mechanisms, some cost-plus some market based, et cetera. I can’t really give any input on how we would consider changing pricing mechanisms, for obvious reasons. Operator: The next question comes from Ken Zaslow of Bank of Montreal. Please go ahead. Ken Zaslow: My first question is, you said that 60% of your capital spending is going to growth. In an environment where you’re a little struggling with your operational efficiencies, particularly in Chicken, why not dedicate more resources to that to ensure the margin structure gets to where you want to be on an operational basis rather than focus on growth. Just a philosophical question, I guess. Stewart Glendinning: Yes. Ken, I wouldn’t necessarily conflate those two things. I think, first of all, on the chicken side, all resources that are necessary to help bring that business back are being deployed there. So, absolutely no shortage of investment there. But, when you look across the portfolio, there are a number of places where we have opportunity to grow our business by adding capacity. You think about our case-ready plant that is opening in Utah, we’ve got a number of opportunities in Prepared Foods. And we recognize that unless we put money ahead to meet that capacity, we’re going to be in a place where we miss out on sales. Ken Zaslow: Okay. And then, my follow-up question is, what is your ability to realize the higher pricing in chicken? It sounds like -- I understand the feed cost side, even the operational side, but it sounds like we’re seeing breast prices move. We’re seeing leg prices move. Wing prices are pretty substantially higher. And yet, it doesn’t seem like you’re fully incorporated. Is it just because of the contracts have to kind of get through, and we’ll start to see that by the end of the year or into next year? How are you about that? Just the realization of pricing seems a little bit more delayed than I would have thought. Dean Banks: We are obviously gaining from the market prices. We do have some buy versus growth strategy where we do buy some breast meat in the market, et cetera. I can’t really comment on pricing looking forward. So, I can’t comment. Stewart Glendinning: Ken, the only thing I’d say is that, to Dean’s earlier comments, we have a wide range of pricing mechanisms. Some of those are, as we’ve shared in the past, fixed over a longer period of time. Clearly, those are not going to move as quickly. Others are spot, and we’ll respond quickly as the market rises. I wouldn’t discount, obviously, the fact that -- my earlier point, which is that the move in grains is pretty substantial. And I wouldn’t overlook either the increase in transportation costs that we’re seeing in the marketplace. So, it’s -- there is a number of factors there that are going to play out in the P&L. Operator: The next question comes from Ben Theurer of Barclays. Please go ahead. Ben Theurer: Hey. Good morning, Dean and Stewart. And thanks for taking my question. Congratulations on surprisingly strong quarter. Quick -- two quick ones. So, first of all, within the broader concept of Chicken and obviously your investments in new plants. So, just to understand and if you could maybe reiterate what you said about three months ago. So, clearly, there’s still going to be the start-up cost to consider, right? And that’s part of your guidance, just to be clear, what you said three months ago to have this properly reflected in the model. Is that correct? Stewart Glendinning: Yes. That’s correct. I will just give you a little bit of update on that. I did say at the time that I thought that the start-up in Humboldt was going to cost about $100 million. That’s coming in a little less expensively now, and we think it’s going to run about $75 million in the year. Ben Theurer: Okay, perfect. That’s a good update. And then, just following up a little bit on the Beef segment and what you came to obviously there. And I mean, it really looks like it’s going to a very profitable year. But, how do you think about the Beef business more in the medium term? I mean, clearly, it’s been on a profitable basis and on a strong run rate over the last couple of years now. Last year was by far, exceptional, you expect another very, very strong year in ‘21 with the updated guidance. But, where do you think this is going to turn out more like a normalized run rate? How do you think cattle suppliers are going to work through? And where do you think there might be a little bit of a headwind, if grain prices were to stay high, to reflect also maybe higher cattle prices, and how can you prepare for that? Dean Banks: So, we do see that cattle -- while greater stock is a slight downtick and could decline over time, herd supplies are actually still very, very strong into the foreseeable future. And what is also quite good for the business is that demand is very strong. And so, we feel like the business is positioned good for the long term. We’re not setting long-term margin guidance for the business, but we feel like the dynamics do look positive into the foreseeable future. Operator: The next question comes from Alexia Howard of Bernstein. Please go ahead. Alexia Howard: So, coming back to the Prepared Foods business, the margin obviously improved very nicely this time around. You mentioned that you pulled back on marketing spending. I’m just wondering, is that from -- assuming that that comes back, and I’d like to hear what your plans are for marketing spending going forward. Is that -- is this kind of the margin run rate that we might expect on that business, or is there still lumpiness that could play out there? Dean Banks: A few things that I would just emphasize. You are correct that we will continue to reinvest in marketing and advertising as needed. There’s been such strong demand and outstripping production in many ways. And so, we’ve pulled that cost back for the time being. It will ultimately return, we won’t be getting projections necessarily on how much that will return to. The other thing to keep in mind is just from a mix perspective, we’ve been thrilled having consumers go to retail outlets in order to get our food. We will see foodservice recover. And from a mix perspective, that will come in probably at a slightly lower margin. And therefore, we do know that Prepared Foods will have some normalization as foodservice ultimately recovers with vaccination rollouts, et cetera. Alexia Howard: Okay, great. And then, as a follow-up, on the Pork side of the business, can we talk about the strength of the export markets at the moment? You’ve talked about that in recent quarters, particularly given the African swine fever dynamic. As we see the swine herd in China, kind of get back to not quite normal levels, but moving in that direction, do you think that whole dynamic of African swine fever pushing up global pork prices is -- what innings are we in, I guess, is the question? Are we more than halfway through that at this point? I imagine we are. Dean Banks: It’s hard to project, to be honest. We still hear reports of ASF in China. We also do know that they’re making aggressive measures to build a commercial herd there and making some progress towards that. We’ve seen global redistribution of protein related to ASF cases in Germany and Vietnam and others. That continues to play itself out generally positively. We see very strong demand for pork, which is helping offset some of the increase in hog prices. And so far, the business is performing well. Projecting ASF is very difficult. We’ve seen historically it to take decade plus to recover from ASF in certain markets. And so, we hesitate to call whether or not we’re halfway through that. Operator: The next question comes from Michael Piken of Cleveland Research. Please go ahead. Michael Piken: I just wanted to get a flavor on the Pork side of the business. Are you doing anything in terms of trying to prepare for California’s Prop 12, which is supposed to take effect next year? Dean Banks: So, we’re obviously aware of the legislation. We are looking at the impacts on the business, but otherwise can’t comment. Michael Piken: Okay. And then, I guess, just kind of shifting gears over back to the Beef side a little bit. I know you mentioned that you think there’s going to be adequate availability of cattle. What are your expectations in terms of, as we progress through the year, in terms of kind of the cattle weights, the grading? And does that have any impact on your mix if weights come off between the choice-select, or is it relatively -- are you guys relatively indifferent, if there’s any changes in the way it’s kind of moving forward? Dean Banks: Whether it’s weather or grains, we will always be looking for the most -- the high-value and the most valuable cattle in the market. It’s not really -- at this point, not really the time we can project out impacts from that, although our team has done a phenomenal job at buying in the marketplace and making sure that we get the right cuts, and we can put those out in the highest margin, highest value. We have invested substantially in our portion of business. We have capacity coming on line in a couple of places in this year next. And I think that’s going to actually continue to support both, Beef and Pork and those businesses as we continue to add value and really meet the customers where they want to buy and with the portions and pieces that they want. Operator: And just to reiterate, is there time for one last question today? Dean Banks: One last question. Operator: Thank you. That question will be from Michael Lavery of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Michael Lavery: I wanted to touch on the international piece of the business, and I guess, maybe understand how much, if any of the gross CapEx is there, is directed there? And where you see the biggest opportunities internationally, either from an organic growth perspective or potentially interest in M&A? Dean Banks: As we’ve said before, the international markets are where we see the majority of protein demand growth coming from going forward. We’re really proud of our teams embracing the One Tyson concept and looking at how we can use our global footprint to take whether it’s a variety of meats in the U.S. and export those and have those valued up into the global marketplace. The acquisitions that we’ve made internationally are really helping us both in further processing product that’s exported from the U.S., but also in really taking advantage of synergies related to different skill sets, functions, innovation that we’ve established globally. So, the international business is a continued focus for ours. We’ll continue to invest capital from an organic perspective, and we are always looking for acquisitions. You’ve seen the recent announcements that we are partnering with Malayan Flour Mills. There’ll be more deals like that and others to come. Stewart Glendinning: Only other thing I’ll just add on top too, specific on the CapEx, Michael, is we have announced investments in plants in both Asia as well as in Europe. So, yes, specific money is going there to build out new capacity to meet the demand that we see. Michael Lavery: Okay. That’s great. Thanks. And just a follow-up on the Jimmy Dean Plant-Based Patty. Could you just touch on some of your thinking using the Jimmy Dean brand with plant-based and what the consumer insights were behind that, and how you think about that launch? Dean Banks: Sure. That brand has just tremendous value to the customer. And if you’ve been to a retail grocery store and look at the freezer, the breadth and depth of that portfolio resonates with just a variety of customers. Plant-based protein, not only do we have a phenomenal substrate or innovation there, but we think that that brings another customer to that freezer aisle and complements our business. And so, it was a very thoughtful approach, and you’ll see more of that to come. Michael Lavery: And so, I think, you just alluded to this at the very end, but there’ll be -- we should look for more plant-based options to come as well? Dean Banks: Yes. Our investments in plant-based protein are continuing to show velocities and results that we would expect. So, we’ll continue to be investing in that area. Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Dean Banks for any closing remarks. Dean Banks: Thanks again everyone for your interest in Tyson Foods. We hope you and your families stay healthy and safe. And we look forward to speaking to you all again soon. Thank you. Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.
Tyson Foods Beats on Q2 Earnings, But Revenue Miss Weigh on Shares
Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) reported mixed second-quarter results, topping profit expectations but missing on revenue, which sent its shares down more than 7% intra-day today.
The company posted adjusted earnings of $0.92 per share, beating analyst estimates of $0.84. However, revenue came in slightly below expectations at $13.07 billion, compared to the $13.16 billion forecast. Sales were flat year-over-year, weighed down by a $343 million legal contingency accrual that reduced revenue by 2.6%.
Despite the top-line miss, Tyson showed notable improvement in profitability. Adjusted operating income rose 27% year-over-year to $515 million, and the company’s adjusted operating margin expanded to 3.8% from 3.1%.
Looking ahead, Tyson maintained a cautious but stable outlook. For fiscal 2025, the company expects adjusted operating income between $1.9 billion and $2.3 billion. Full-year sales are projected to remain flat or increase by up to 1% compared to fiscal 2024.
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) Earnings Report Highlights
- Tyson Foods reported a revenue of $13.07 billion, missing the estimated $13.38 billion.
- The company's EPS of $0.92 exceeded expectations, with a positive surprise of 8.24%.
- Despite the earnings beat, Tyson's stock experienced a sharp decline of 9.5%, indicating bearish market sentiment.
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is a major player in the food industry, known for its production of chicken, beef, and pork. The company is a significant competitor in the market, alongside other giants like JBS and Cargill. On May 5, 2025, Tyson reported its earnings, revealing a revenue of $13.07 billion, slightly below the estimated $13.38 billion.
Despite the revenue miss, Tyson's earnings per share (EPS) of $0.92 exceeded expectations, surpassing the consensus estimate of $0.85. This represents a significant increase from the $0.62 EPS reported a year ago, delivering a positive surprise of 8.24%. However, the company's profits have decreased compared to the same quarter last year, contributing to a negative market sentiment.
The stock experienced a sharp decline, dropping 9.5% to $54.99, marking its worst day in two years. This downturn has pushed Tyson Foods to its lowest trading levels since January, with the stock now below all short- and long-term trendlines, ranging from the 20- to 320-day moving averages. The revenue shortfall, despite the earnings beat, has led to bearish sentiment among traders.
In the options market, there has been a surge in activity, with 2,418 calls and 6,454 puts traded, which is 3.6 times the average daily options volume. The most popular options are the June 57.50 put and the May 55 put, indicating bearish sentiment among traders. This reflects concerns about Tyson's future performance and its ability to meet market expectations.
Tyson Foods' financial metrics provide insight into its valuation and financial health. The company has a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 21.65, indicating the price investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings. Its price-to-sales ratio stands at about 0.37, suggesting that investors are paying $0.37 for every dollar of sales. Tyson's debt-to-equity ratio of about 0.49 shows a moderate level of debt compared to its equity, while a current ratio of approximately 1.67 suggests good liquidity to cover short-term liabilities.
Tyson Foods Rises 2% as Strong Q1 Results Signal a Comeback
Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) delivered a stronger-than-expected performance in the first quarter, sending its shares up around 2% intra-day today. The food processing giant exceeded Wall Street estimates on both earnings and revenue, highlighting improving operational execution and robust growth in its poultry division.
For the quarter, Tyson reported adjusted earnings per share of $1.14, significantly outpacing analyst expectations of $0.90. Revenue climbed 2.3% year-over-year to reach $13.62 billion, surpassing the consensus forecast of $13.5 billion.
The company's poultry segment was the standout performer, with operating income more than doubling to $351 million from $177 million a year earlier. Improved efficiency and pricing strength contributed to an adjusted operating margin expansion in the chicken segment, rising from 4.8% to 9.1%.
Looking forward, Tyson provided an optimistic outlook for fiscal 2025, projecting adjusted operating income between $1.9 billion and $2.3 billion. Sales are expected to remain flat or grow modestly compared to fiscal 2024, signaling confidence in continued stability across its business units.
Tyson Foods Stock Falls 7% Following Q2 Revenue Miss
Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) experienced a more than 7% decline intra-day today despite the company surpassing expectations with its second-quarter earnings. The adjusted earnings per share (EPS) reached $0.62, well above the analyst estimate of $0.39. However, quarterly revenue fell slightly short, totaling $13.07 billion versus the expected $13.14 billion.
Tyson's financial performance has markedly improved compared to the previous year, with a significant 525% increase in adjusted operating income and a notable shift in adjusted EPS from -$0.04 to $0.62. This improvement is credited to the effective execution of strategic initiatives that have driven year-over-year growth in the company's bottom line.
Tyson's President & CEO, Donnie King, emphasized the success of these strategies, highlighting their contribution to the company's return to year-over-year profit growth.
Looking ahead, Tyson Foods projects its fiscal 2024 adjusted operating income to range between $1.4 billion and $1.8 billion. Sales are expected to remain relatively stable compared to fiscal 2023, and the company aims to maintain liquidity above its minimum target.
Tyson Foods Inc. Hits 15-Month High on Strong Fiscal Q2 Earnings
Tyson Foods Inc. (TSN:NYSE) Climbs to 15-Month High on Strong Earnings
Tyson Foods Inc. (TSN:NYSE) recently made headlines with its stock climbing by 1.9% toward a 15-month high in premarket trading, following a strong fiscal second-quarter earnings report. The company, a household name for its range of branded meats, showcased a significant financial turnaround, reporting a net income of $145 million, or 41 cents per share. This is a stark contrast to the loss of $97 million, or 28 cents per share, it reported in the same period the previous year. This recovery is particularly noteworthy as it marks the first time Tyson Foods has seen bottom-line growth in two years, a success largely attributed to robust beef and pork sales, despite challenges in the chicken segment.
The financial metrics of Tyson Foods provide a deeper insight into the company's current market position and valuation. With a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately -25.29, TSN is trading at a negative earnings multiple, which typically indicates investor skepticism about future earnings or an acknowledgment of recent financial difficulties. However, the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of about 0.41 suggests that the stock might be undervalued relative to its sales, offering a potentially attractive entry point for investors looking for value stocks.
Further analysis of Tyson Foods' valuation metrics, such as the enterprise value to sales (EV/Sales) ratio of approximately 0.56, reinforces the notion of potential undervaluation. This ratio, which compares the company's total valuation to its sales, suggests that the market might be underestimating Tyson Foods' revenue-generating capability. Additionally, the enterprise value to operating cash flow (EV/OCF) ratio of around 13.04 provides an angle on the company's valuation in relation to its cash flow from operations, a critical factor for assessing a company's financial health and its ability to sustain operations and growth.
The company's financial structure and liquidity are also crucial for understanding its overall health and stability. The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio of about 0.53 indicates a moderate level of debt compared to equity, suggesting that Tyson Foods has not overleveraged itself and maintains a balanced approach to financing its operations. Moreover, the current ratio of approximately 1.49 points to a healthy balance between its assets and liabilities, highlighting the company's ability to cover its short-term obligations without facing liquidity issues.
In summary, Tyson Foods' recent earnings report and subsequent stock performance reflect a significant turnaround in its financial health, driven by strong sales in its beef and pork segments. Despite the negative P/E ratio, other financial metrics suggest that the company might be undervalued, presenting a potential opportunity for investors. The balanced financial structure and healthy liquidity further underscore Tyson Foods' resilience and its prospects for sustained growth.
Tyson Foods Shares Drop 7% Following Q3 Results
Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) released its third-quarter financial results, which were not as strong as expected. This led to a decrease of over 7% in its shares in pre-market today.
The company reported earnings per share of 15 cents and revenue of $13.14 billion. These figures fell short of the market consensus, which had anticipated earnings of 27 cents per share and revenue of $13.63 billion. In comparison to the previous year, overall revenue declined by 2.6%. The drop in pork sales volume by 1.8% was a contributing factor, and analysts had been anticipating a 1.5% growth.
Despite the challenging market conditions, Donnie King, CEO of Tyson Foods, expressed the company's unwavering commitment to achieving sustainable growth and improving margins.
In response to the results, Tyson Foods announced the closure of four chicken facilities. Looking ahead, the company expects full-year sales to be in the range of $53-54 billion, aligning closely with the consensus estimate of $53.63 billion.
Tyson Foods Shares Drop 7% Following Q3 Results
Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) released its third-quarter financial results, which were not as strong as expected. This led to a decrease of over 7% in its shares in pre-market today.
The company reported earnings per share of 15 cents and revenue of $13.14 billion. These figures fell short of the market consensus, which had anticipated earnings of 27 cents per share and revenue of $13.63 billion. In comparison to the previous year, overall revenue declined by 2.6%. The drop in pork sales volume by 1.8% was a contributing factor, and analysts had been anticipating a 1.5% growth.
Despite the challenging market conditions, Donnie King, CEO of Tyson Foods, expressed the company's unwavering commitment to achieving sustainable growth and improving margins.
In response to the results, Tyson Foods announced the closure of four chicken facilities. Looking ahead, the company expects full-year sales to be in the range of $53-54 billion, aligning closely with the consensus estimate of $53.63 billion.
