Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) on Q3 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
Operator: Good evening. Welcome to the Transcat, Inc. Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Craig Mychajluk, Investor Relations for Transcat. You may begin.
Craig Mychajluk: Yes. Thank you, and good morning, everyone. We certainly appreciate your time today and your interest in Transcat. With me here on the call today, we have our President, Chief Executive Officer, Lee Rudow; and our Chief Financial Officer, Mark Doheny. After formal remarks, we'll open the call for questions. If you don't have the news release across the wire after markets yesterday, you can find it at our website at transcat.com.
Lee Rudow: Thanks, Greg. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the call today. Some of you have already met with Mark, spoken with Mark, but being that this is his first earnings call with Transcat, I'd like to introduce him before we move on to the third quarter results. Mark was named CFO in November, succeeding Mike Chitter, who retired at the end of the calendar year. The transition went very smoothly. Mark is well versed in our business and strategy and is an excellent addition to the executive team. We anticipate Mark's extensive background in M&A and operations will be of great value in the execution and acceleration of our strategic plan, including the continued investment in technology and technology-based infrastructure. Turning to our third quarter results. We are pleased by our performance, especially given the continued adverse condition caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The team's responsiveness and dedication throughout the pandemic has been impressive, and the business continues to effectively provide critical support and service to many essential businesses, including the research, manufacturing and distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines.
Mark Doheny: Thanks, Lee, and good morning, everyone. It's great to be with you all today, and I hope you are keeping safe and doing well. I'm certainly excited to have joined the Transcat team at such an exciting time in the company's history, and I look forward to contributing to our continued growth and success. I will start on Slide 4 of the earnings deck, which provides detail regarding our revenue on a consolidated basis and by segment. Consolidated revenue of $44.1 million was up 2% from prior year, and we showed growth for the first time this fiscal year, a notable achievement given the ongoing impact of the pandemic. Turning to the segment performance. As Lee mentioned, strong service segment growth of approximately 12% was one of the highlights of the quarter, with about half of that segment's growth coming organically and the other half from acquisition growth.
Lee Rudow: Okay. Thank you, Mark. As we progress through the fourth quarter and into fiscal 2022, we will continue to focus on the execution of our strategic plan. We expect the combination of mid- to high single-digit organic growth and acquired growth to drive overall double-digit service growth. Consistent with our strategy, we expect the bulk of our service growth to be generated in regulated industries, including life sciences, aerospace and defense. Throughout fiscal 2021, operational excellence and technology have helped drive significant improvement in our service gross margin. We expect the margin expansion to continue over time as we increase the level of technology, including automation into our network of 42 calibration labs. We also expect emphasis to continue on the development and acquisition of talent across all levels of the organization to Shepherd Transcat through our next phase of growth. And I will close with an update on our acquisition program. As anticipated, our M&A pipeline is very active.
Operator: At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. And our first question is from Greg Palm with Craig Capital Group.
GregPalm: Mark, congrats on the good quarter here. So maybe we start with service segment and the return to organic growth. They're curious if you can maybe go into a little bit more details on the primary drivers of that? I mean is it outsized growth in life sciences? Is it just a continued recovery elsewhere? Maybe there's some share gains in that?
LeeRudow: Yes, Greg, I think it's kind of a combination. So I think we saw -- I would characterize it as some flow-through on pent-up demand. The first crop of quarters in service were more flat. We knew we had a nice pipeline. We were having good conversations. So some of that flow through came about, I think, general sales level activity has increased. Our pipelines are solid on the organic side of the business. And I'm not at all surprised that it just-in-time and in this fiscal year, we'd see some of that growth. So I think you'll see it continue for the most part, in the next few quarters. But that's how I would characterize it.
GregPalm: Yes. Do you get the sense that there's still a decent chunk of pent-up demand out there? And I guess, what's your confidence level that you can sustain this kind of mid- to high single-digit organic growth rate, even in sort of a challenging and volatile end market scenario where we're still in?
LeeRudow: Yes, I think it's relatively high. I mean the one thing that leads me to make that kind of comment is we've got a number of large opportunities that have been working their way through the pipeline throughout the pandemic. And while we won a number of them, they're still sort of an interesting number of opportunities still out there. And I think we're going to win our percentage of those, and we have a high confidence level. And that, in addition to pent-up demand and in addition to just general levels of calibration picking up based upon pipeline activity, I think the combination of those 3 things drive our confidence level and make the statements we do around the organic growth. Yes.
GregPalm: Okay. Good. Last one, we're almost a year into this pandemic. And I'm curious, what sort of long-term trends are starting to emerge within service? I'm thinking along the lines of maybe there's more pickup in delivery versus periodic on-site or in-house. So I'm just kind of curious how much of this -- some of these new trends, how much of that might stick? And what are the P&L implications, if any? It's an interesting question. I don't -- I'm not ready to comment on any long-term changes as a byproduct of the pandemic. I mean we've all learned to manage our businesses accordingly. There have been less on sites, even less pickup in delivery, more people sending stuff to us, and I think we're going to return to normal rates in time. And I also think that the one thing that we didn't see this year was the trajectory continue on our growth in CBLs. We had a 2-year period, as you recall, Greg, where we landed a really healthy number of new CBLs' client-based labs. And there are larger opportunities. And while they're in the pipeline, they just virtually stopped during the pandemic. That I would anticipate would return at some point in the near future. And so other than that, I think the business will return to a normal state at some point. No long-term lasting effects that I would identify today.
Operator: And our next question is from Kara Anderson with B. Riley Securities.
KaraAnderson: I jumped on a little bit late. So sorry, if you already discussed this, but can you talk about the nature of the Biotech acquisition and how it seemed to be? Why you saw that small attractive calibration services when you wanted to own?
LeeRudow: Right. Absolutely. So about a year ago, the best place to start is with pipe bets.com. about a year ago, we acquired in February, pipe bets.com. And basically, both companies, biotech and pipe beds do pies, almost -- not exclusively, but it's the lion's share of the work that they produce. The difference between them and why we were interested in biotech is because pipe bets is generally a Boston-based operation that does most of its work in the New England region and does very little, if any, on-site work. So they -- if people want to send pipe bets from anywhere in the country, they can send them, but most of their work comes from New England. Biotech is a small company, you are right. But the entire company is based on on-site services for pipe bets. So when you look at the sort of road map and you say, well, if we can combine the biotech on-site service with what we call the depo, New England based pipe bets.com, you've really got a powerful combination. And that's why we talk about sales synergies and getting to them fast. And there's even cost synergies in this one because you're going to combine these operations, and there are probably some redundancy in the administration of the combined business. So it was small. We never would have bought it as a stand-alone but it's a bolt-on to pipe bed.com makes a lot of sense for us.
KaraAnderson: And are there any other technical capabilities that you are looking for, where you can kind of do these kind of acquisitions where you just find other ones to build on and you kind of just build out a new category, if you will?
LeeRudow: Well, one of our 3 drivers when we look at acquisitions in general, is to increase our capabilities or bring on expertise we don't have today. That's a main driver in addition to expanding our geographic footprint. And just in general, bolting on operations when they're close in vicinity of an infrastructure that we already have in place. So yes, there's a list, and we -- it's too much -- it's not appropriate to go into the details on this call, but you've got disciplines and variables and parameters that we don't measure today that we actually outsource. We have about 90 -- 85% to 90% of our own work, but we still outsource, Kara, about 15% of that work. And all caimanes do that. Nobody does 100% because the economies of scale and such. But yes, I would think that we always look at that list whether it's flow or different technologies that are new that come out, we always want to look to bring them on board and make them core. And one way to do that is through acquisition is when it makes sense.
KaraAnderson: Got it. And then just one last relatable question about kind of M&A. Are you seeing a change in the size of opportunities at all?
LeeRudow: So a part of our pipeline, which is -- which I alluded to on the call, is very robust. Part of that pipeline, I would characterize as fitting sort of our core historic pipeline, our sweet spot, much of the same, if you will. And I would also say that what makes this pipeline a little bit different is we are starting to see activity levels and opportunities present themselves at sort of the next level up upstream in terms of size. So that is something we thought that we would encounter. And in fact, we are. So it's kind of a combination of the historic sort of pipeline in trends and some new somewhat larger opportunities as well.
MarkDoheny: Yes. And just to add to that, I think, adding Jim Jenkins 4 months ago to really dedicate a lot of his time to developing that pipeline and the relationships that we need to has really improved the pipeline and a lot of areas, even in the last 120 days since I've been here, Lee.
LeeRudow: Good timing with the market making that investment here.
MarkDoheny: Yes.
Operator: And our next question is from Scott Buck with HC Wainwright.
ScottBuck: Lee, you mentioned earlier in the call the kind of mix in the services segment between mail in and on site. Can you remind us what the margin differential is between some of those different components?
LeeRudow: So the -- yes, let me address that. The largest in terms of profitability, the profile that's most attractive to us is our depot work. We call it in-house or depot, and that is when a customer Scott sends their equipment to us because there's very little incremental cost. Just imagine 10 units coming into a lab, you don't have to spend capital. You don't have to hire people to do it. It kind of flows through at that high incremental tech revenue. Another service level we have is pickup and delivery. And again, that work is pick up at the customer's location, brought back to the lab. And so that does have the same profitability profile to the in-house work, except we have to go pick up and deliver. So there's a little bit different cost profile, additional increased costs to get that done, but not a lot. Then we have on-site work, where we send a crew of people and a band fool of assets to a customer's location. And these are periodic on sites might be 3 technicians for a week. It might be one technician for a day. It really varies. But you have your assets sort of isolated and captive to that customer at that time. And you've got technicians out doing the work. And so that profile is a little bit more expensive, but something we're always interested in and one really important way to grow the business. Then we have client-based labs. And this is where we have our technicians 3, 4, 5, 10, sometimes 15 technicians that show up every day at a customer's location. That's where they work. They very rarely ever go to a Transcat core lab. And we have assets there. Sometimes it's a customer's asset, sometimes we own the assets. And they perform the work. That's high-volume work. Many of these are high 6 figures into 7 figures. The margin profile is a little bit less by a couple of hundred basis points, but it's a very sticky part of our business, high lifetime value in fact, to date. In the 8 or 9 years I've been here, we've never lost one of these client-based labs that we started. And so you've changed a little bit on margin for that stickiness over time. So those are the 4 main service levels and the margins associated with it.
ScottBuck: Great. That's very helpful. Second, how do you guys think about long-term margin targets in the services segment? I know you're undergoing some technology improvements and additional automation. Over the next 5 years, can margins in this segment get to mid-30s?
LeeRudow: Yes, I think mid-30s is not an unreasonable target at this point. We started this campaign of margin improvement in technology back when we were, I want to say it was 24% gross margin. We talked about a 2, 3-year journey, several year journey to get closer to 30%. And so we're there, right? It won't be every quarter that we're 30%. We've done higher. We'll this past Q3 a little bit lower. But we're in that range. So I think when we look at the business and the margin profile and what we have on top in terms of investments, I think we're thinking the same as you suggested. Mid-30s is not unreasonable. It's not going to happen overnight. It's not going to happen every single quarter. But I think we'll be up and to the right -- heading to that range over the next couple of years, for sure.
Operator: And our next question is from Mitra Ramgopal with Sidoti.
MitraRamgopal: First, I just want to get a sense, Lee, in terms of -- as you talked about the investments you're making in technology, how far along are you on that front in terms of where you'd like to be? And as it relates to adding technicians, how has the market been in terms of being able to recruit it without having to necessarily overpay? And is it really a reflection of the visibility or the comfort you have in the business as you look out over the next couple of years in terms of making these additions.
LeeRudow: Well, from a technology perspective, Mitra, we've been on a 3 to 4 -- well, a 3-year journey of starting from an infrastructure that really sort of lacked some of the technology advancements that we needed. And we've been working day and night to catch up. And I think team has done a really good job. We've hired some really good people who have a pretty good idea of where we are, where we need to go and how we're going to get there. So I've been very impressed with the team effort around technology. But there's a lot to do. Yes, we love the margin improvement. We love some of the tools that we've built for integration. But if I were to use the analogy of a base in baseball, you might say, "Gosh, we're probably in the fourth inning at best in technology. " So a lot of upside there, and we're looking forward to it. Technician availability, well, with flat organic growth for the first couple of quarters but we certainly weren't aggressive about going out and getting new technicians. We had the right number. We had the capacity to service that work. The pipeline is healthy. We saw organic growth in the third quarter. We anticipate organic growth for the most part going forward. So we will need to hire technicians at some point. I think that's perfectly fine. That's part of our game plan to do so. I'm not worried about the long-term organic growth potential of the business so that they would hold me back from hiring. And I think we'll hire as appropriate to manage the growth. And I think the type of tools we have in technology in place today. There's a lot of data that we didn't have a couple of years ago around productivity, capacity planning. And these are the tools we talk about. This is where you see the margin enhancement. But these tools also help us identify when and where to put technicians and at what time is the optimal time to do that. So that data availability has helped us make those decisions. So we have a high level of confidence we'll get it right.
MitraRamgopal: Okay. And then quickly on the life science business. I was just wondering if you're seeing any heightened interest or conversations because of the pandemic maybe driving, you can see development for vaccines and other things. Just curious if you're getting any tailwind out of that. Right. It's difficult to tell because we were always life science oriented. We do business with most pharmaceutical companies and med device, that's always part of our normal business. I would say for the moat -- but I get what you were asking, Mitra. And I would say for the most part, the business that we've -- the sort of stable environment in terms of revenue this year, it's just been core life science business. No question we're dealing with pharmaceutical companies that are involved with vaccines. But I don't think it's been all that much in terms of incremental. I think it's just the business that we do. These companies have held up. These companies have been stable and resilient, and so we've been stable and resilient. I think when COVID passes and we get beyond it, I think it's upside for our business because the general industrial market is going to open back up. So we've done really well in life sciences. But I think there's upside to the general market returning.
MarkDoheny: And I would just mention, too, these pockets within life sciences, like, for example, the pipe pets.com business, that's definitely been impacted in a very favorable way over the last 11 months since we've owned them. So we have pockets of it.
Operator: And our next question is from Dick Ryan with Colliers.
DickRyan: Sale, switching to maybe distribution. Are you seeing any green Shoot opportunities in that part of the business? I know oil and gas has been negatively impacted and whatever. But are you seeing any positive or any suggestions of positive momentum emerging?
LeeRudow: Yes. Moderate at best. We do see some -- we do see a little bit. We actually had a lot of back orders leaving the third quarter and intend the fourth quarter. That I think will -- that sort of COVID related supply chain slowdowns. Some of that will help the fourth quarter. But your question is more about the general environment. I think there will be some pent-up demand on the industrial side for distribution, but it's not like we've seen a ton of it yet. We do anticipate it coming. The business has been it's been what it's been, an d that is it's off single digits now from last year, but it's stable. And we're going to continue, like I said, in the earnings call, we're going to continue to leverage those interactions. That's really what we focus on Dick.
DickRyan: Okay. Maybe one Mark's direction. OpEx, you probably had some savings early on with less travel and other pandemic limitations that you're able to do. Are any of these costs kind of coming back into the fold? And maybe how should we look at OpEx going into fiscal '22?
MarkDoheny: Yes. And it's a great question, one, we spend a lot of time on understanding, especially the service gross margin as example, how much is sustainable and how much potentially be, hey, we're not traveling as much. Maybe we're not spending as much in certain areas. There's a very little -- there's a little of that going on, I would say, when we do start traveling again, they'll be a little bit there, but it's really not meaningful, I would say. And so as you think into -- going into next year, yes, you could see a little bit of an uptick in some of those sort of discretionary costs, travel probably being the biggest one. We get sort of a normal operating environment. But it's not something that's -- I would highlight as a big driver of some of our operating income and gross profit improvements. That's how I would answer that.
DickRyan: Okay. Good. Congrats on a good execution. Thank you.
Operator: And our next question is from Chris Sakai with Singular Research.
ChrisSakai: Just had a question on distribution gross margin. I just wanted to know if you could shed some light on there when you guys might see some improvement?
MarkDoheny: Yes. That's a tough one to call. You've got a couple of things happening there. Of course, the lower volumes, which we talked about due to the market. But our vendors have reduced their co-op advertising and rebate programs. So we're working closely with them. That's really when you look at the year-over-year change in margins, that's the biggest contributor to the decline. So depending on how things progress with the pandemic, it's tough for us to plan any big bounce backs on that at this point. But I know our teams on the distribution side, working closely with the vendors to see the opportunities there that would help the margins.
Operator: We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. And I'll now turn the call over to management for closing remarks.
Lee Rudow: Okay. Well, thank you all for joining us on today's call. We appreciate your continued interest in Transcat. Feel free to check in at any time with us with me or with Mark. We look forward to talking to everybody again after the fourth quarter results come out. And again, thanks for participating.
Operator: This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Related Analysis
Transcat, Inc. (NASDAQ:TRNS) Earnings Report Analysis
- Earnings per share (EPS) of $0.64 was reported, slightly below the estimated $0.66, marking a negative surprise of 3.03%.
- Revenue for the quarter was $77.13 million, surpassing the estimated $76.40 million by 0.44%.
- The company has a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 44.23, indicating a premium valuation by investors.
Transcat, Inc. (NASDAQ:TRNS) operates within the Zacks Instruments - Control industry, providing calibration and laboratory instrument services across various industries. Headquartered in Rochester, New York, Transcat is committed to quality and precision, competing vigorously in the instrumentation and control sector to maintain its market position.
On May 19, 2025, Transcat reported an EPS of $0.64, slightly below the estimated $0.66, resulting in a negative surprise of 3.03%, as highlighted by Zacks. This EPS also represents a decline from the $0.77 reported in the same quarter the previous year. In the preceding quarter, the company faced a larger negative surprise of 15.09%, with an EPS of $0.45 against an expected $0.53.
Despite the earnings miss, Transcat's revenue for the quarter ending March 2025 was $77.13 million, exceeding the estimated $76.40 million by 0.44%. This improvement from the $70.91 million reported a year ago indicates some progress, although the company has only surpassed consensus revenue estimates once in the last four quarters, pointing to challenges in meeting market expectations.
Transcat's financial metrics reveal more about its performance. The company's P/E ratio is 44.23, suggesting a premium valuation by investors. Other ratios, such as the price-to-sales ratio of 2.78 and the enterprise value to sales ratio of 3.00, reflect the company's valuation in relation to its sales. The enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio of 23.97 indicates the company's cash flow generation relative to its valuation.
The financial health of Transcat is supported by a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.23, showing conservative debt usage. A current ratio of 2.42 suggests strong liquidity, enabling the company to effectively cover its short-term liabilities. Additionally, an earnings yield of 2.26% provides insight into the return on investment for shareholders.
Transcat, Inc. Surpasses Q4 Expectations with Strong Financial Performance
- Transcat, Inc. reported significant year-over-year growth with an EPS of $0.77, surpassing the estimated EPS of $0.52.
- The company also exceeded revenue expectations, reporting $70.91 million for the quarter, a 14.3% increase year-over-year.
- Strategic acquisitions and an extra week in the fiscal year 2024 contributed to Transcat's impressive performance, alongside strong valuation metrics such as a P/E ratio of approximately 80.33 and a P/S ratio of about 4.22.
Transcat, Inc. (NASDAQ:TRNS), a leading provider in the instrument control industry, has recently reported its financial results for the fourth quarter ending March 2024. The company specializes in accredited calibration services, cost control, optimization services, and the distribution and rental of professional-grade handheld test, measurement, and control instrumentation. Transcat's performance in this quarter has been particularly noteworthy, with the company not only surpassing Wall Street expectations in terms of earnings per share (EPS) and revenue but also demonstrating significant year-over-year growth.
On Monday, May 20, 2024, TRNS reported an EPS of $0.77, which exceeded the estimated EPS of $0.52. This performance marks a substantial improvement from the previous year's EPS of $0.48, showcasing an earnings surprise of 48.08%. Such a remarkable increase in EPS year-over-year indicates that Transcat is on a solid path of growth and profitability. The company's ability to consistently outperform consensus EPS estimates, as it has done for the fourth consecutive quarter, reflects its strong financial health and operational efficiency.
In addition to its impressive EPS figures, Transcat also reported revenue of $70.91 million for the quarter, surpassing the estimated revenue of $68.59 million. This represents a significant year-over-year revenue increase of 14.3%, with the figures reaching $70.91 million. The revenue performance exceeded the Zacks consensus estimate by 3.14%, further highlighting Transcat's ability to exceed market expectations. This consistent ability to surpass consensus revenue estimates over the last four quarters underscores the company's robust growth trajectory and its competitive edge in the Instruments & Control industry.
The financial results for the fourth quarter also reflect the positive impacts of the acquisitions of TIC-MS, Inc., SteriQual, Inc., and Axiom Test Equipment, Inc. These strategic acquisitions, finalized throughout the fiscal year 2024, have contributed to the company's performance, indicating effective integration and leveraging of new assets to fuel growth. Additionally, the fiscal year 2024 included an extra week, making it a 53-week year, which may have also played a role in the reported growth and margin expansion.
Transcat's valuation metrics, including a P/E ratio of approximately 80.33 and a P/S ratio of about 4.22, suggest it is valued higher than the market average. However, the company’s robust financial performance and minimal debt, with a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.018 and a solid current ratio of around 3.14, underscore its financial stability and growth potential. These strengths, along with its consistent ability to exceed expectations and strategic acquisitions, position Transcat well for future success in its industry.