iRobot Corporation (IRBT) on Q1 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript

Operator: Good day everyone and welcome to the iRobot first-quarter 2021 financial results conference call. This call is being recorded. At this time for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to Andrew Kramer of iRobot Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Andrew Kramer : Thank you Tiffany. Good morning everybody. Joining me on today’s call are iRobot’s Chairman and CEO, Colin Angle and Executive Vice President and CFO, Julie Zeiler. Before I set the agenda for today’s call, I would like to note that statements made on today’s call that are not based on historical information are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and involve many factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Additional information on these risks and uncertainties can be found in our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. iRobot undertakes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information or circumstances. Colin Angle: Good morning. Thank you for joining us and happy Star Wars Day! 2021 is off to a very good start. Our first quarter revenue of $303 million grew 58% which we converted into operating income of $15 million, an operating profit margin of 5%, and EPS of $0.41. We believe that our first quarter revenue growth demonstrates that our value proposition continues to resonate with consumers around the world. We generated strong top line growth in each major geographic region as we benefited from stronger than expected demand from our distribution partners in EMEA and vibrant retail orders in North America, including certain orders that were previously anticipated for the second quarter. These dynamics were complemented by another quarter of triple digit growth in our direct-to-consumer channel. Based on our strong Q1 performance and favorable consumer demand tailwinds, we see continued growth ahead and we have raised our full year revenue outlook. We also reaffirmed our 2021 profitability and EPS expectations as we have adjusted our spending plans to offset expected gross margin pressure from transitory supply chain challenges. As we move forward, we are optimistic about our potential to deliver upside to our updated 2021 targets. Julie Zeiler: Thank you Colin. As Andy mentioned earlier, my review of our financial results and outlook will be done on a non-GAAP basis, so unless stated otherwise, each mention of gross margin, operating expense, operating income and operating profit margin, effective tax rate and net income per share will mean the corresponding non-GAAP metric. All quarterly comparisons are against the first quarter of 2020 unless otherwise noted. As Colin noted, our Q1 performance represents a strong start to 2021. Total Q1 revenue grew 58% to $303 million and exceeded our original targets, due primarily to stronger than expected orders from distributors in EMEA and U.S. retailers, including over $5 million in orders that were originally expected in the second quarter. Geographically, revenue grew 40% in the U.S. with international revenue up 70% due primarily to 74% growth in EMEA and a 53% increase in Japan. From a product mix perspective, Roomba robots and accessories represented 89% of our Q1 revenue mix, with Braava making up the remainder. Since the start of the pandemic over a year ago, more consumers are buying our products online. We estimate that approximately 56% of total first quarter revenue came from ecommerce, which comprises our own website and app, dedicated e-commerce websites, and the online arms of traditional brick and mortar retailers. Our gross margin of 40.7% in Q1 was largely unchanged from the prior year’s first quarter. Changes in pricing and promotion, higher air freight fees, and higher costs to procure certain components were essentially offset by leverage from higher sales, lower tariff costs, favorable channel mix, and the timing of one-time write-offs associated with pausing certain product activities in the first quarter of 2020 that did not recur in the first quarter. Colin Angle: Thank you Julie. We are at the midway point of a multi-year strategic plan to transform iRobot into a more defensible, more profitable business capable of sustaining solid growth with scale, channels and offerings to address the evolving needs of an expansive and expanding global customer base. Our recent accomplishments and progress, from driving innovation in robotic floor care and introducing complementary cleaning products to offering extended warranties, advance promising new high value services, and selling more accessories all illustrate the importance of our investments to build out our ecommerce and digital marketing capabilities. They also highlight our potential to grow existing customer revenue and further improve the profitability of our enterprise in the process. We expect more progress on these and other related fronts over the coming quarters. On our Q4 call in February, we shared our preliminary thoughts on what our business may look like in 2022. That view remains unchanged, regardless of the short term supply chain turbulence we’ve recently encountered. Over the past several quarters, we’ve made good progress in refining our long term strategic plan. As we finalize this activity, we have started our planning process for a virtual investor day event that we plan to hold later this year. We believe this will be an important opportunity for analysts and investors to fully appreciate why we are so enthusiastic about our prospects. We expect to finalize the timing for this event soon and will share those details with you accordingly. That concludes our comments. Operator, we will take questions now. Operator: Your first question comes from the line of Asiya Merchant with Citigroup. Asiya Merchant: Great, thank you. Thank you everyone. That was a very strong demand environment that you guys outlined--that you guys delivered and are outlining for the year. I had a few clarification questions. First on the U.S. side, based on the results and the data that you provided, if you think U.S., if I look at it not just last year because of the pandemic but further out, it’s kind of flattish relative to what it was in March ’19. Are there any inventory or channel dynamics here to consider? And then as we look ahead into a more normalized environment in fiscal ’21 as it relates to Prime Day and spring activities and promotional activity, how should we think about Q2 this year versus last year, when Prime Day was kind of shifted later into the year? If you can talk a little bit about the demand dynamics there. Then lastly, I know EMEA was very strong, I’ve heard some of my other companies also talk about the strength in EMEA. If you can talk to us about sell-in versus sell-through in EMEA and Japan, that would be helpful. Thank you. Colin Angle: Sure, let me start. Relative to your inventory questions, what we said is that we’re in a very good position, which would mean superior from where we were a year ago when the pandemic was starting. Last year, we saw retailers drive their inventory to extremely low levels and then generally slowly build toward the back part of the year, back to a more normalized position. We had a very Q4 last year which allowed us to enter into Q1 of this year in a superior position than we did in ’20, and we’ve been able to, based on the strength of the sell-through that we described, keep those inventory level at healthy positions. The question of is there any inventory fill or over-supply dynamics to consider for the balance of the year, I would say at this time we don’t see that. We don’t see that we have an exposure either in a--with any of our retailers from an inventory position, and I think that we also see with retail doing--having weathered 2020, we don’t see any unusual risks with channel viability, so I would say the answer to your first question is nothing out of the ordinary. We’re very healthy in those dynamics. Relative to your comments around Prime Day, it is a choice of Amazon every year to either include or not include us in Prime Day, and we’ve been fortunate enough to have a strong history with Prime Day, but we have not announced what our situation is with Amazon and Prime Day at this point. Julie, what do we know about timing on Prime Day? I think it would happen in--at a more normal time, is the expectation, so that would mean were it happening, sell-in would happen in Q2. Of course last year, we did have some sell-in for Prime Day in Q2 as well. Julie Zeiler: And then Asiya, I think we always work hard to make sure that we find balance over time between sell-in and sell-through. As we mentioned in our prepared remarks, through week 15 we’re seeing very solid global sell-through, particularly driven by the U.S., and overall as we look forward to Q2, we expect strong sequential growth. We have to remember as we go through 2021, we’re going to be comping an unusual 2020 and so as we look to make sure that we’re continuing to build on the customer demand that we’re seeing, a lot of that is going to normalize as we go through 2021 and 2022 will have a more-- Colin Angle: Typical comp. Julie Zeiler: -typical comp. Asiya Merchant: Okay, and if I may, one more on the accessories side. How should we think about contribution from accessories into what you’re expecting - you know, high teens to 20% growth? What should we think about accessories more in ’21 and then as you ramp up into the outer years? Colin Angle: I think at this point, we’ll just give some high level color on that answer, but as our direct to consumer business grows, the opportunity to drive more accessory sales is almost outpacing the growth in DTC, so it is a definite tailwind on revenue growth and financial performance so that as we look forward, we see the increase in DTC definitely accelerating the contribution of accessories to our performance. Asiya Merchant: Great, thank you. Colin Angle: You bet. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of John Babcock with Bank of America. John Babcock: Good morning and thanks for taking my questions. Starting out, you talked a little bit about component shortages as well as inflation in raw materials, freight and transportation. On that point, I was wondering if you could talk about your relationship with the contract manufacturers and also provide some color on how your contracts with them are structured, just so we can get some sense on how this might roll through results. Colin Angle: We’ve got long term relationships with our contract manufacturers and definitely a strong partnership to work through these challenges. I think that what made the current situation unusual was component suppliers de-committing components that we had expected and having to go into the open market and do spot buys, which we did effectively although that was a driver of additional cost. The impact, the financial impact of that is included in the guidance that we have given. This gets better as we are able to go and secure longer term commitments and take more, a slightly higher inventory position on some of the components that have been impacted and will lead to a normalization of cost as we roll the clock forward. It’s why our expectations around the color for 2022 remain unchanged and the guidance that we gave for 2021, we are confident in raising our revenue guidance and covering the incremental costs of raw materials and transportation within our previously given operating income guidance. John Babcock: Got you, and might you be able to talk about some of the raw materials where you’re seeing the most inflation? Colin Angle: You know, just resins are up 50% in some situations. It is a--there’s definitely a disruption to supply chain that is temporal, it will take some time to work through, but we do expect it to normalize back to traditional levels at this point. That’s one significant example. John Babcock: That’s great. Then also going back to the last set of questions, I was just wondering if you might be able to talk about some of the key trends that are driving that strong growth in EMEA. Colin Angle: I think that robot vacuuming continues to grow as the method of floor care for the future. This is something that we’ve seen happening and continues - it’s Roomba and a hand vac is increasingly how people think about cleaning their floors. We still have relatively low household penetration. There is still strong opportunity for continued growth, and we are at a phase of consumer adoption where the majority of consumers are now realizing that this is not a fad, this is the new normal, and I think that realization was accelerated last year through spending more time at home and the work-from-home changes in consumer behavior. I think that this is a vibrant industry at an exciting time in its growth. John Babcock: Okay, did just want to squeeze in two other quick ones here. First, there have been some proposals in the U.S. about changes in the corporate tax rate, as well as the global minimum tax, and I was wondering if you might be able to just quickly talk about how that might impact iRobot. Then also, I think on the last call you mentioned expecting 2022 earnings to be above 2020 levels, and just wanted to see if that is still the case. Julie Zeiler: Yes, I’ll take that one, John. Obviously some of what’s being written now about potential changes in the corporate tax rate are things that we are watching closely. I have nothing new to add to that, and as that evolves, we’ll continue to look at that and its implications. When we look forward into 2022, the color that we’ve provided is underpinned by our expected continued healthy market growth and the fact that iRobot will benefit appropriately from that continued growth. We expect that we’ll see a number of things start to turn in our favor - gross margin headwinds turning into tailwinds, continued calibration of our spending and driving operating leverage, and so that we expect our OI to be above 2020 levels and substantially stronger EPS performance. Those things, which we talked about during our Q4 call, are all things that we continue to feel confident in today. John Babcock: Thanks for that. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Mike Latimore with Northland Capital Markets. Mike Latimore: Thanks a lot. Really strong growth in the quarter there. In terms of the supply shortage, did that influence your revenue guidance much or is it more just on the margin side? Colin Angle: It certainly influenced both, and we alluded to there being some additional juice that may be in our financial performance, assuming we can unlock it through continued strong demand and continued ability to grow our supply. In a constrained or an unfavorable supply situation, companies are less able to meet growth demand because of lead times, componentry lead times which have been substantially growing over the past few months, and so assuming that we can find the supply, we believe the demand is there and the growth in revenue guidance we’re signalling today represents the best view we have at this moment in time, where we’re admitting that there is some uncertainty around availability of incremental product that hampers our ability to lean even further forward. This is where we think we are today, but again the demand is there, we’re very excited with our position and how customers are responding to our product, and it’s a bit of a--it’s also early in the year for us to be touching our guidance at all, so I think that there’s a strong message in the fact that iRobot just increased revenue guidance in the Q1 call, which is not something we have done frequently in our history. Mike Latimore: Great, makes sense. Then on EMEA, was the strength there largely related to launching the I3 in the region or this combo product or channel activity? A little more color there would be great. Colin Angle: It was largely demand up and down our product lines. The I3 definitely was a contributor to it, but I think that Europe is in just a very healthy--is a very healthy market from a demand perspective and is catching up with North America and Japan, where robots caught on a little bit earlier. Mike Latimore: Okay. Then just last on the 10.7 million consumers that have opted in, what percent of those are actually buying something, not a Roomba or Braava but an accessory or a warranty, that sort of thing? Colin Angle: That’s a great question and something we look forward to giving more color on in the future. We’re sort of--as we are rolling out our direct program, we wanted to start releasing new statistics to our analyst and investor community, the first being what is the size of the connected pool. We’ll be talking about existing customer revenue and some other key metrics in the future as we continue to implement the tools required to accurately measure and communicate those. But great question - stay tuned. Mike Latimore: Thank you. Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Ben Rose with Battle Road Research. Ben Rose: Good morning. A question for Colin with regard to the Roomba combo. Was curious to know if you could give some additional color in terms of its performance in the quarter and in general your thoughts about combination robots at this point. Colin Angle: The Roomba combo is an entry level robot that combines mopping and vacuuming capabilities and is available in very, very limited markets where we think that tactically it makes sense. iRobot is very committed to the fact that the premium and the best way to clean your floor is to separate vacuuming and mopping functionality. Just the physics of both the cleaning process and getting the pad into--up to the edges and into the corners, where the most dirt is, benefits substantially from a two-robot solution. As evidenced by strong Braava performance, our customers are agreeing with our strategy, so it’s a tactical play. There are some markets where particularly at the lower price points, we find ourselves competing against products that have that two-in-one, where people are willing to accept the lower level of clean, willing to accept more involvement in deciding before every mission whether you’re going to mop or vacuum and what parts of your home are you going to do this. Again, it’s a little anathema from our vision of how robots should care for your home, but it is a useful tactical play. Ben Rose: Okay, and just to follow up, I’m intrigued by the progress in the Genius Home platform and wanted to know, I guess strategically, whether you have thoughts about perhaps opening that up to other companies’ products to participate in the benefits of the platform. Colin Angle: We already integrate with other companies’ products, so you’re starting to see that happen already. I think that it’s very exciting, the growth and the utilization of things like clean while I’m away. Particularly with work from home, just finding a good time to clean is a real challenge for many of our customers, and so the idea of the cell phone has left the building, time to go clean is a compelling proposition, and we’ve integrated with other devices in the home. We’re very open to it. We think that as we move forward, you’re going to see iRobot driving more thoughtfully and automatically configured opportunities for the home to do more in service of the customer, and the examples that we have rolled out and are beginning to see adopted are emblematic of that direction. This is--I guess that’s a long way of saying, yes. Ben Rose: Okay. Thanks very much, that’s helpful. Colin Angle: You bet. Ben Rose: Your next question comes from the line of Jim Ricchiuti with Needham. Tyler Bailey: Hi, this is Tyler Bailey. I’m filling in for Jim. Thanks for taking my question, and congrats on the strong demand this quarter. Just wondering, you kind of mentioned various headwinds - supply chain, transportation, freight, and obviously the component shortages. Just wondering if you might be able to opine and parse out the impact of each on margins. Julie Zeiler: Yes Tyler, this is Julie. I’ll try to answer your question. As we’ve looked at a number of these things, we’re giving our best aggregated view of what we think those incremental costs look like, and certainly any one individually, perhaps you’d have a way through, but when you start to look at them all together, it’s a headwind for us as we look to the rest of the year. You named the big ones, so as I look as a percent of our total, the increased raw material costs are significant, as are roughly the same the increased transportation, which we would expect over time to normalize. Then I’d point to the scarcity of some of the componentry and our need to do spot buys out in the market, and then finally the fourth piece would be air freight. Those four things make up the lion’s share of the impact. Tyler Bailey: That’s helpful, I appreciate that. Then just a follow-up, obviously you mentioned recalibrating some of your expenditures to adjust for some of those costs. Just wondering, are we going to see the typical ramp-up in quarter two, or should we, I guess, be more thinking of later half, Q3, Q4 for those adjustments in spending? Julie Zeiler: Yes, so one of the things that we talked about in our prepared remarks is we do--well, if you look at our spending Q1 to Q2, we would expect fairly nominal growth across both R&D and G&A. Sales and marketing does have substantial sequential growth planned, as it normally does, associated with our promotional environment, the holidays that happen in the second quarter. Tyler Bailey: Okay, thank you. Then just one last question, interested to hear a little bit more about the launch of the handheld. I’m curious - obviously it’s an extension towards your existing customer base and filling a need there, but do you see it from a strategic standpoint eating into any of the market share in the current handheld vacuum market? Colin Angle: Launching the handheld was strategic for a few reasons. The first, it was the first example of using a new capability with our direct to consumer engine, so that’s selling an additional product directly to our customers, and so that we were testing out the plumbing. It’s something that we’ve talked about doing as a way of enhancing our existing customer revenue. It’s also something that is a very logical adjacency, given that the future of floor care is a Roomba and a hand vac. It’s a very high quality, premium hand vac, certainly not the flagship of iRobot artificial intelligence technology, but it’s a strong performer for what it does. I think that you should expect that over time, the learnings from launching this hand vac will pave the path for other types of product offerings and developing direct as an additional channel for new product introductions. We think that the product we’re offering is very competitive and we definitely hope that it can grow and be a legitimate performer in the hand vac market against its competitors, and so it’s certainly not an anecdotal product that we just threw out there. We think it’s strong and we can build on that category as a logical adjacency. Hope that helps. Tyler Bailey: Yes, that’s great. Appreciate it. Thanks Colin, thanks Julie. Julie Zeiler: You’re welcome. Operator: Again ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. Again, that is star, one. We do have a follow-up question from the line of Asiya Merchant with Citigroup. Asiya Merchant: Great, thank you again. Given the component shortages that are not just specific to iRobot but across the industry, some of the companies have talked about a more benign pricing environment, less promo pricing. Just given your strong balance sheet and ability to get components, etc., perhaps better than some of your peers, can you talk about what you’re seeing on a market share? Should we expect at the retail level to see iRobot gain share because of these dynamics, and how should we think about the limited promotional pricing on your gross margin guide for this year? Colin Angle: I think it’s difficult to predict the behavior of our competitors. In all markets, our major competitors are China-based manufacturers, and they have and are using slightly different chips than we have, and in 2019 when tariffs came in, we observed our competitors were content to continue some of their promotional pricing and leave their prices where they were and operate under a different margin structure. We built our year assuming that our competitors would remain aggressive and we would go and react as we have traditionally done, leading to the optimistic look that we have communicated today. I think that we’re planning for competition to find ways of weathering this storm, and we don’t view it today as a strategic advantage in the marketplace. Time will tell, but I think that’s the safe way of viewing it. Julie Zeiler: I guess the other thing to underscore is we continue to believe that we have a very compelling value proposition as we look at our products and their ability to fit seamlessly into the lifestyle of our consumers. We will continue to focus our energy and effort on improving that overall user experience and ensuring in our promotional activities that we’re explaining that effectively out to our customer base. We think that’s the way to win long term. Asiya Merchant: Fair enough. Okay, thank you. Operator: We do have a follow-up question from the line of John Babcock with Bank of America. John Babcock: Hi, thanks for taking my follow-ons here. Just quickly, I was wondering if you might just be able to remind us how you’re thinking about new product launches for this year. Obviously you have the handheld vacuum, but I thought you also were talking about launching some other products, so if you can maybe provide some rough color, recognizing you can’t be too specific, just around where that innovation might occur. Colin Angle: Sure. We’ve communicated that there are two new robots to come this year, and we haven’t specified any details about what those products are. I would tell you anecdotally I’m very excited to see what’s coming, but we’ll have to leave it at that. But I guess I could say they’re on track and unaffected by the supply chain challenges that we have talked about, so we’ve been able to mitigate the impact on these product launches. It’s all as per plan. John Babcock: Okay. Then next question, I was just wondering if you might be able to talk about what you’re hearing from traditional retailers about the reopening here and how they’re thinking about it, and then also how you’re thinking about how consumers might adjust spending as we get more people vaccinated and hopefully at some point beyond the pandemic. Colin Angle: Well, definitely we saw a huge shift to online and ecommerce in 2020, and continuing through the first quarter of 2021. We talked about 56% of our revenue coming from ecommerce channels - that’s significantly up from something closer to 40% in 2019 when we had a 60/40 split. I think that we could see retail brick and mortar come back a bit, but certainly we would not expect a retreat to 2019 levels, more of a single digit move over time as people get back to retail. We’re pretty agnostic as to whether we’re selling online or retail, with the exception that we’re very, very excited about the continued strong growth in our direct-to-consumer dimension of our business, which we’re investing substantially in and enjoying improved gross margin and access to consumers via that channel. John Babcock: Okay, and then just my last question for today, I suspect there may not be much here, but I was just wondering if there are any updates on the litigation with Shark. Colin Angle: Not at this time. John Babcock: Got you. All right, well thanks again. Operator: At this time, there are currently no further questions in queue. I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Kramer for any closing remarks. Andrew Kramer: Thank you very much, Tiffany. Thanks everybody for joining us. We look forward to speaking with our shareholders and analysts over the coming days and weeks and seeing you at various conferences that we’ll be participating in, in May and June. Look forward to future engagement, and if you do have questions, feel free to ring Investor Relations. Thank you so much. Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating. This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect.
IRBT Ratings Summary
IRBT Quant Ranking
Related Analysis

iRobot Corporation's Financial Struggles and Strategic Review

  • iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ:IRBT) reported an EPS of -$2.52, missing estimates and expressing "substantial doubt" about its future operations.
  • The company's stock plummeted over 35% following the announcement of financial instability and uncertainties surrounding new product launches and market conditions.
  • iRobot's financial metrics reveal significant challenges, with a negative P/E ratio of approximately -0.87 and a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.08, indicating low debt but ongoing losses.

iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ:IRBT), known for its Roomba robot vacuum, recently reported its earnings, revealing an earnings per share (EPS) of -$2.52, which fell short of the estimated EPS of -$1.45. Despite this, the company generated a revenue of $172.04 million, slightly surpassing the estimated $171 million. However, the company has expressed "substantial doubt" about its ability to continue operating, as highlighted by its recent earnings release.

The announcement of financial instability has led to a significant decline in iRobot's stock, dropping over 35%. The company faces uncertainties with new product launches, consumer demand, competition, macroeconomic conditions, and tariff policies. In response, iRobot's board has initiated a strategic review to explore options like refinancing debt, potential sales, or strategic transactions. This move aims to address the challenges and stabilize the company's future.

iRobot's financial metrics further illustrate its current challenges. The company has a negative price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately -0.87, indicating ongoing losses. The price-to-sales ratio is 0.18, suggesting the stock is valued at 18 cents for every dollar of sales. Additionally, the enterprise value to sales ratio is 0.019, reflecting a low valuation compared to sales, while the enterprise value to operating cash flow ratio is negative at -0.42, indicating difficulties in generating positive cash flow.

The company's financial difficulties are also evident in its earnings yield, which is negative at -1.16%. Despite these challenges, iRobot maintains a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.08, indicating a low level of debt relative to equity. The current ratio stands at 1.32, suggesting a reasonable level of liquidity to cover short-term liabilities. These metrics highlight the company's financial struggles and the need for strategic actions to improve its situation.

To navigate this challenging period, iRobot has appointed Neal P. Goldman as an independent director. Goldman's experience as CEO and managing member of SAGE Capital Investments and chairman of the board of Talos Energy is expected to be invaluable. His expertise in guiding organizations through financial and operational transformations will be crucial as iRobot explores strategic options to address its financial instability.

iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ:IRBT) Faces Financial Challenges in Q2 2024

  • iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ:IRBT) reported a significant downturn in Q2 2024, with a wider-than-expected adjusted loss and a sharp decline in revenue.
  • The company's financial strain is highlighted by an adjusted loss of $1.96 per share and a revenue of $166.4 million, both missing Zacks Consensus Estimates.
  • Challenges include a shift in consumer preferences, a decrease in units shipped, and a drop in average selling prices, affecting both domestic and international operations.

iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ:IRBT), known for its robotic vacuum cleaners and other automated home devices, faced a challenging second quarter in 2024, as evidenced by its financial performance. The downturn reflects broader challenges in the consumer electronics sector, where competition is fierce and consumer demand can be volatile. iRobot's performance is particularly noteworthy given its position as a leading player in the home robotics market, competing against both established electronics giants and emerging tech startups.

The company's adjusted loss of $1.96 per share was notably below the Zacks Consensus Estimate, indicating a deeper financial strain than analysts had anticipated. This loss also represented a significant decline from the previous year's figures, underscoring the worsening financial health of iRobot. The revenue figures further painted a grim picture, with iRobot generating $166.4 million, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate and marking a substantial year-over-year decrease. This decline in revenue was across the board, affecting all product categories, which signals a broad-based slowdown in consumer demand for iRobot's offerings.

A closer look at the sales composition reveals a shift in consumer preferences, with premium and mid-tier robots comprising a smaller portion of total robot revenues compared to the previous year. This shift, coupled with a sharp decrease in total product units shipped and a drop in average selling prices, suggests that iRobot is facing challenges not only in maintaining its sales volume but also in sustaining its pricing power in the market. The significant decrease in revenues from solo and other products, alongside a drop in units shipped, further highlights the difficulties iRobot is encountering in its product mix.

Geographically, the company saw a decline in revenues from both domestic and international operations, with a particularly steep fall in domestic revenues. This geographic breakdown indicates that iRobot's challenges are not confined to a single market but are widespread, affecting its global operations. Despite efforts to manage costs, as seen in the decrease in the cost of revenues and operating expenses, iRobot's financial health deteriorated, with a significant contraction in adjusted gross margin and a decrease in cash and cash equivalents on its balance sheet.

Looking ahead, iRobot's outlook for the third quarter and the full year of 2024 suggests that the company is anticipating some improvement in its financial performance. However, the projected net sales and adjusted loss per share indicate that iRobot still faces a tough road ahead in navigating its current challenges. The company's Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) reflects a neutral stance on its future performance, suggesting that investors are taking a wait-and-see approach to iRobot's ability to turn its fortunes around.