EPR Properties (EPR) on Q2 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript

Operator: Good morning ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q2 2021 EPR Properties Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later we will conduct a question and answer session and instructions will follow at that time. . As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Brian Moriarty, VP of Corporate Communications. Please go ahead. Brian Moriarty: Thank you, Alisha. Hi, everybody, and welcome. Thanks for joining us for today for our second quarter 2021 earnings call and webcast. Participants on today's call are Greg Silvers, President and CEO; Greg Zimmerman, Executive Vice President, CIO and Mark Peterson, Executive Vice President and CFO. Greg Silvers: Thank you, Brian. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's second quarter 2021 earnings call and webcast. During the quarter we continue to make significant strides as we announced that cash collection levels exceeded the high end of our guidance and that nearly all of our properties are open. Fueled by these strong fundamentals, we achieved a critical milestone and subsequent to quarter end we announce the early termination of our covenant relief period. Importantly, this milestone is a turning point to allow us to return value to shareholders and pursue external growth. I'm also pleased to have announced the resumption of our monthly dividend to common shareholders, which we anticipate continuing to increase alongside earnings growth over time. I'm very thankful to our employees, partners and shareholders who have supported our efforts in achieving this milestone and navigating these unprecedented times. Throughout the U.S. we're seeing consumers driving the experiential recovery. Having been cloistered in their homes for months consumers have an even greater appreciation for the experiences that our Properties offer. As we've stated consistently, consumer demand has not been an issue. This is most recently been highlighted by the response of the movie going public as delayed releases have finally begun to come to theaters. Greg Zimmerman: Thanks, Greg. At the end of the second quarter our total investments were approximately $6.5 billion with 357 properties in service and 95% occupied. During the quarter, our investment spending was $16.5 million, bringing the total investment for the first half of the year to $68.6 million in each case entirely in our experiential portfolio. The spending included build-to-suit development and redevelopment projects. Our experiential portfolio comprises 283 properties with 42 operators and accounts for 91% of our total investments or approximately $5.9 billion of the $6.5 billion. We have four properties under development. Our education portfolio comprises 74 properties with eight operators and at the end of the quarter was 100% occupied. Now, I'll update you on the operating status of our tenants, our deferral agreements and rent payment timelines. 99% of EPR theaters were open as of July 26th. Based on relaxation of provincial restrictions our four theaters in Canada reopened at reduced capacity in mid-July. We continue to operate two theaters through a third party manager in Columbus, Ohio and Champaign, Illinois. In Q1, I noted we had five unleased theaters which were vacant. But which we planned to release, none of which were operated by major exhibitors. I'm pleased to report that we have executed leases for all five theaters and we anticipate they will reopen this year. All of our theaters which will continue as cinemas are leased. As previously reported, we have recaptured six theaters which we are marketing for sale, including two with executed contracts. Mark Peterson: Thank you, Greg. Today I will discuss our financial performance for the quarter, provide an update on our balance sheet and strong liquidity position and close by introducing 2021 guidance. FFO's adjusted for the quarter was $0.68 per share versus $0.41 in the prior year and AFFO for the quarter was $0.71 per share compared to $0.44 in the prior year. Total revenue for the quarter was $125.4 million versus $106.4 million in the prior year. This increase was due primarily to improve collections and revenue from certain tenants which continue to be recognized on a cash basis. I'll have more on collections later in my comments. Greg Silvers: Thank you, Mark. As you've heard today, we've made significant progress on all fronts and are pleased with that progress. However, we are not done. With more than $500 million in cash and an undrawn revolver we are focused on deploying capital to drive earnings growth and increase tenant diversity. I want to say again how proud I am of the entire team in realizing these goals early. And we look forward to more accomplishments as we move throughout the balance of the year. With that, why don't I open it up for questions. Whitney? Operator: Your first question is from the line of Katy McConnell with Citi. Katy McConnell: Great. Thank you. Good morning everyone. Greg Silvers: Good morning, Katy. Katy McConnell: Could you plant some more color on the sale process for the one theater asset sold this quarter just as far as pricing and buyer demand? And then the same for an update on the fix that you have in process now? Mark Peterson: Greg, do you want to answer? Greg Silvers: Sure. We sold four theaters over the past year as I mentioned since Q3. One's been for industrial, a couple from multi-family and one was for a retail use. This theater will be for multi-family. The contracts we have include one for industrial. The four were marketing or for various opportunities, not industrial. Office, retail, potential multi-family. As we've said before, Katy, we'll provide an update on the cap rate and other information related to the sales once we get through selling most of these assets later in the year or early next year. Katy McConnell: Okay. Thanks. And then now that you have the ability to pursue external investment more in the near term, can you update us on the types of opportunities you're seeing? And whether you're targeting more one-off assets or portfolio deals at this point? Greg Silvers: Again, Katy, what we've said is, we've been pretty clear about the fact that we want to grow our tenant diversity. So we've said, we're not looking to grow our theater portfolio, but our other areas of experiential as far as whether that's one-off or portfolios, given our cash balance were open to all of those, all the above. I think we have to recognize that it's -- we're actively building that pipeline that it's already half of the year. So if any larger transactions are probably going to take time and be toward the end of next year or end of this year or toward the beginning of next year. But I know Greg and his team are actively out there pursuing kind of large and small transactions. And it just feels really good not only for ourselves, but our team to get back in that involvement. And I know our tenants greatly appreciate it as they look to expand their business and respond that they've got a capital partner ready willing and able to go forward with them. Katy McConnell: Okay, great. Thank you. Operator: Your next question is from the line of Anthony Paolone with JP Morgan. Anthony Paolone: Okay. Thanks. Good morning. My first question is with the 5% vacancy in the portfolio, does that -- like how's that tie with some of the leasing, it sounds like you did on the vacant theaters? Greg Silvers: Again, I think our overall 5% vacancy is really. Go ahead, Mark. Mark Peterson: Yes. I think, we've got some properties we're marketing for sale. And I think that's included in vacancy, because they're being marketed for sale. All the ones that as Greg said, all the ones that we expect to lease have been leased. But we still have some theaters as Greg mentioned that we're marketing for sale that are vacant on the experiential side. Greg Silvers: And then just a relatively small number, but we do have some entertainment retail centers that may have an occasional small shop vacancy, but… Mark Peterson: Which we've always said is open. Greg Zimmerman: Yes. Consistent with us. Mark Peterson: Exactly. Anthony Paolone: Okay. So the five that you leased that's included already in those sort of vacancy numbers? Or basically not in there because they're leased? Mark Peterson: They're in there and then we've got -- the vacancies really stemming from the -- like I said, the vacant theaters that we plan to sell and a little bit of the retail that Greg mentioned at our entertainment retail centers. So we've already got that -- another way to say it, that 95% does include all the ones that we expect to lease are in that number. Then we just -- that number will go up as we sell these properties. And then, they'll always be some vacancy due to the entertainment retail centers likely. Anthony Paolone: Got it. And you all -- it seems like the run rate, the revenue run rate's been in that $554 million range as you've laid out sort of your expectation for collections and so forth. What do these theater leases add to that when they're up and running or commence? Mark Peterson: Well, I think right now for the rest of the year, the theater leases are more on a percentage rent deal. So they'll really kick in more next year. Greg Zimmerman: Yes. And they probably won't open until later in the year. Some of them have to have a little bit of renovation done. They were closed for a year and a half. We're hoping to get them all open at least by Q4. Mark Peterson: I think more than anything, Tony, I think and I'll ask Greg to comment that that these -- we've released these at or about the range of where they were released at before pre-pandemic, which I think bodes well for the quality of the theaters that we have given our ability to change operators and achieve lease levels that are very similar to what we had before in this environment. Greg Silvers: And just in terms of dollars I think those are probably worth a little over $3 million. Greg Zimmerman: Yes. Anthony Paolone: $3 million in incremental. Mark Peterson: Yes. More next year. Anthony Paolone: Okay. Got it. That's helpful. And then just the only question I had was as you look to make investments again, can you maybe put some numbers around where cap rates are for the various segments in which you'd like to deploy capital? Mark Peterson: Rather than break down every one of them, I think what we've said is that -- and I'll ask Greg to comment somewhere around the mid seventh is kind of where we think opportunity and deployment is available. So -- and as I said, it's going to be in areas that we would say all of our experiential other than kind of the theater segment. Anthony Paolone: Okay. And do you think that's -- I think you were on the casino deal, you all were close to -- previously, it sounded like that was maybe a mid-high sevens kind of number, but there's been a lot of liquidity in that space. Do you think that number would still hold if you went back to a transaction in that nature? Do you think that's compressed to all? Greg Silvers: We're going to have to see. Again, there's no doubt that there has been transactions that have occurred. But even to-date those have been more kind of Vegas focused. But Greg maybe you have? Greg Zimmerman: Yes. I mean, the one major non-Vegas focus was the Springfield transaction with MGM and MGP and that was a 7.5 cap. Anthony Paolone: Okay. Great. Thanks for the color. Greg Silvers: Thanks Tony. Greg Zimmerman: Thanks Tony. Operator: Your next question is from the line of Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets. Todd Thomas: Hi. Thanks. Good morning. Just first question, I just wanted to follow up there on investments and the comment about revisiting the gaming asset that you were pursuing before the pandemic. Can you talk about that specifically and perhaps provide an update on that on that process? And just curious whether there's potential for something to happen in 2021 or whether that might be something more for 2022 as you've exited the covenant relief period and look to pursue growth? Greg Silvers: Todd, we've talked about and expressed our continuing interest in gaming and think it fits. It's a logical fit to our portfolio. I don't know that it makes sense for us to comment on a potential deal. So I'd rather leave it there. We've been pretty straightforward about the fact that it's an area that we think we're going to pursue. And I think it makes sense to add to our portfolio. But Greg maybe you have anything more to add. Greg Zimmerman: No. Todd Thomas: Okay. And then, thinking about sort of shifting the offense and deploying capital, Mark, can you talk about leverage today sort of coming out of the pandemic and reminds us of the company's long-term leverage target -- long-term leverage targets and whether that's changed at all or perhaps discuss where you expect to be at year end or heading into 2022? Mark Peterson: Sure. Yes. The good news is by the end of the year we should be back in sort of that mid-five range that we target. And that's where we've kind of always operated around the mid-fives debt-to-EBITDA. So, as we go into next year kind of x transactions that number actually will probably drop slightly, because we've got additional cash flow and so forth coming in next year. So, the good news is here in the near term we're back to kind of that investment grade metric of mid-fives that we've always operated at. Todd Thomas: Okay. And just one question on guidance. Can you provide an update on Cartwright? I think you said, it opened July 1st. Can you just walk through the financial model impact there and the contribution from that asset that's embedded in the guidance? And any early reads since the reopen there? Mark Peterson: We're not giving specific guidance on Cartwright. I will say, just opening it's going to take some ramp time. So we're not expecting a large contribution over the remainder of the year. As it's ramping back up, there's sales and marketing expenses to get going again et cetera. So, we're not anticipating in our guidance significant contribution. It'll be some contribution. But that really should come more into play next year when we get a full season and another -- it's been open this year and then you have a full season next year. Greg Zimmerman: And I would say from an operations perspective, it's only been open for three weeks. So we're ramping up after it have been closed for a year and a half. But the early results we're pleased with and it's in line with what we expected. Todd Thomas: Okay. All right. Thank you. Greg Zimmerman: Thanks. Operator: Your next question is from the line of Rob Stevenson with Janney. Rob Stevenson: Good morning, guys. Can you talk about what you're seeing in the marketplace on good performing theater valuations today versus the pre-pandemic? I assume cap rates are still tricky given NOI. But on a per screen or seat valuation or are these things not trading. And the only things that are trading here are the scrapes and adaptive reuses? Mark Peterson: I would say and then I'll let Greg to comment. I mean, I don't think we can be much clearer. I don't think we're in the market for looking at theater, so we haven't been looking at transactions involving operating theaters. As far as what we're seeing it's -- you really hit it. It's adaptive reuse. So I think it's -- we're just in a little bit different place right now, Rob. So we're not really as I said, looking at theaters to grow that portfolio. But Greg? Greg Silvers: No. I think that's exactly right and I think you summarized it, Rob. Rob Stevenson: Okay. Because I was just -- not so much the ads, but if you wanted to market one of your say top 20 AMC locations for sale today versus July 2019. Just trying to triangulate here what type of pricing differential we're looking at? Because it seems like a lot of people are sitting on -- other than you guys are sitting -- are also sitting on theaters and maybe they don't want to sell now, because they think valuations are depressed. But it looks like either 2022 or early 2023 there might be a wave of these things as people want to get out of them and just wanted to sort of understand what was going on pricing wise here? Mark Peterson: It's a great question. I just don't think there's a lot of realization of that right now. I don't think there's a lot of transactions. So it's difficult to give you an answer, Rob. Rob Stevenson: Okay. And then, Greg, can you talk about how the board settled on the $3 annual dividend? What the discussions were about possibly setting it lower and then increasing it on a quarterly basis, concerns that delta or other variants might shut things down or limit capacity in some manner, again, and cause some disruption there? I mean, when you look at it your back end guidance on an FFO basis is somewhere around 160, 170, which is call it a high 80s low 90s FFO payout. Just how you guys thought about that? Greg Silvers: Sure. Great question. And Rob, it really was to deal with taxable income for this year. And so, that was the discussion. There really wasn't a risk discussion or a delta variant or anything. It really was to do based upon taxable income. But there was a view that if our projections continue to hold up that it would allow for meaningful increase next year. Mark Peterson: Yes. Because we have additional normalization that fully happens in 2022 at next year or so that would allow for growth. Greg Silvers: While still maintaining a relatively low 70s payout. Mark Peterson: Right. Rob Stevenson: Okay. So, Mark, I guess the question then winds up being is if you're looking at your sort of fourth quarter sort of revenue collection and the implicit guidance that, that factors. I mean, does that basically assume by your statement there that as we head into 2022 all else being equal and there's no disruptions and the revenue keeps coming back et cetera, that this is going to also force you to raise your dividend in 2022 as well from a taxable standpoint? Mark Peterson: Yes. All things equal just because we have --yes, we're not at quite at a 100% and then we'll -- hopefully next year's going to 2022 we'll be at 100% revenue recognition which will you know drive greater taxable income. So yes, it would imply a dividend increase to cover that tax liability. Rob Stevenson: Okay, great. Thanks guys. Appreciate the time. Mark Peterson: Thanks, Rob. Operator: Your next question is from the line of Michael Carroll with RBC Capital Markets. Michael Carroll: Thanks. So I wanted to talk a little bit about the gaming transactions that are available. And I guess, what other opportunities are out there outside the one that you had under contract pre-COVID? I guess, Greg, correct me if I'm wrong, but the thought was that EPR could compete with $600 million to $800 million of these types of deals a year. Obviously, you gave that number, I guess, pre-COVID. Is that still a good, albeit long-term target with these types of properties? Greg Silvers: Yes. I mean, I think we're going to be able to compete. I think it's -- again, we'll have to see how the valuation is. I mean, we never saw ourselves, Michael, as somebody who was going to compete on $4 billion deals, some of the large Vegas properties. But we do think there will be opportunities that will allow us to play in the space and add meaningfully to our diversity. But Greg? Greg Zimmerman: No, I think that's right. And we still have a strong belief in the value of regional casino assets. Michael Carroll: Okay. And then, can you talk a little bit about, I guess, where these transaction valuations are going in? And I did -- did I hear you correctly that you thought gaming cap rates have compressed more meaningfully on Vegas deals versus regional deals? And there's those opportunities for these regional deals still in those mid 7% type ranges? Greg Silvers: Well, I think what we said, Michael, is that if you look at the data, the data indicates that there clearly is still a premium that is associated with premier Vegas assets and the transactions that we've seen in the market whether that be Vici's Venetian transaction or the recently announced a Blackstone deal. The only data point during the pandemic that we have for a regional asset was MGP's acquisition of Springfield, which was done at a 7.5. I think as with any and all of the experiential assets, I think as normalization comes back we'll see where cap rates go and we will see about our opportunity to play in that. But right now, the data would indicate that there's still a very attractive option for EPR. Michael Carroll: Okay, great. And then last one for me. I think last quarter you highlighted that the studios and exhibitors for theatrical releases were still targeting about a 45-day window. I mean, has that changed over the past few months given the releases that have occurred in the results that these studios and exhibitors solve on the May and June type releases? Greg Silvers: I don't think that's kind of any -- if anything again and I'll make my comment and I'll ask Greg. I think there is still a greater recognition of the value of theatrical exhibition windows to the total value of a movie title. I would direct if you haven't to the comments of IMAX's CEO on their earnings call who directly took on the issue of Disney. And their opinion is that they realize that the best way to maximize revenue dollars is to have an exclusive theatrical exhibition window. We may see some more experiments as we work through the year on what the actual right number of days on that is. But I think there is agreement on not only the need for a theatrical window, but standardizing that to where it maximizes revenues across the entire spectrum. Greg Zimmerman: I think that's right. And as I mentioned, Disney only has one more that is dropping simultaneously for the rest of the year, Jungle Cruise this week. Michael Carroll: Okay, great. Thank you. Operator: Your next question is from the line of John Massocca with Ladenburg Thalmann. John Massocca: Good morning. Greg Silvers: John, good morning. John Massocca: So, a quick question on guidance. I just noticed the lower bound of kind of the Q3 cash rent collection guidance was 82% and just kind of stood out given you collected 85% in 2Q. Is that just conservatism? Or is there something kind of tangible maybe driving that reduction at the low end versus what was actually achieved in 2Q? Mark Peterson: Yes. So midpoint 84%, we collected 85%. It's really because in the second quarter we had a couple of tenants pay us unexpectedly actually because of our performance, and so they paid us more. That may continue. We're just being a little bit more conservative to if they're going to pay outside of their deferral agreement, if that's going to happen again in Q3. It could happen. We're just being a little bit more conservative there. We also had one tenant who pays according to -- there's a base and then they pay relative to their normal rent also a percentage rent based on performance, so we're being a little more conservative there. But it could happen very similarly. I think what's going to happen going forward is, while we have non-theaters kind of going down a little bit in Q3 for conservatism, theaters will start to go up in Q3 and then really go up in Q4 is really what's driving the kind of the forward. Q3 is pretty similar to Q2 when you kind of cut through it all. And then Q4 is where the big increases. John Massocca: Okay. And then it looks like Regal was kind of paying partial rent in 2Q, 2021 if my math is right. Is that in line with a deferral agreement with them? And if so, can you provide any color as to when that would potentially end? Greg Silvers: Well, we don't speak to any particular agreement. What we can tell you, John, is that everyone is paying in accordance with their deferral agreement or their contractual lease. So -- and that short of and Mark, I'll have to comment on this. But short of maybe one attraction tenant, I think everyone is pretty much back to their full contractual rep by the beginning of 2022. Mark Peterson: I think everyone is -- it's just that one of them is a cash basis, so it'll be more seasonal in terms of how we get that. But everyone's back to 100%. I mean, John, to answer your question, everyone's preferring -- performing according to the deferral agreement plus, because we were 10 million over the midpoint, 10.2 million over the midpoint. So I'd say, yes, it was plan. What happened during the second quarter was planned and then we got some unplanned due to out performance. So I think things are actually happening better than we had anticipated. John Massocca: Okay. And I guess, yes, these you're going to collect at the high end kind of 99% of revenue recognition in Q4. I guess maybe they think about the range in that kind of Q4 collection given what you're saying, is that based on kind of conservatism? And you may be some six months out kind of maybe just taking a little bit of leeway for any kind of credit events or anything like that? Mark Peterson: Are you talking about Q4 cash collection guidance? John Massocca: Correct. Yes, the 95% to 90%, oh, that's revenue. 95% to 99% revenue recognition or the 93% even to 97% cash collection? Mark Peterson: Yes. So, it jumps up a lot primarily driven by theaters on both sides of that equation. And then there's just -- there's a couple of tenants that have deferrals through and it's not many. Through that go into the Q4 and they'll fully normalize in next year. So in 2022, we'll be at 100%. There's a small amount of tenants that aren't quite at the 100% revenue recognition at the end of Q4. John Massocca: Let's may nail down my question though, like that 99% revenue recognition, that assumes everyone continues to pay per their deferral agreements, right? If they do they'll get 99% revenue recognition? Mark Peterson: Well, our guidance is 95% to 97% for rev rec for the last quarter, right? So if everyone pays 97% and then if there's a possibility of going above that. If we get these cash basis guys to pay, in some cases they're paying early and that could continue. So it could be -- could start to approach 100% by the end of the year, but our guidance is 95% to 97%. John Massocca: And then, just bigger picture. Let's say theoretically that kind of simultaneous streaming or PBOD becomes industry standard, how are you thinking about coverages for your theater properties? I guess, would you continue to kind of have robust enough coverage given the kind of leases that are in place if you are seeing some of that box office may be siphoned off into a Disney Plus Premier Access or a kind of equivalent streaming service from one of the other studios? Greg Silvers: Yes. I mean, again, I think first of all we would based on what we said earlier, we'd challenge that assumption. I think you're seeing more and more evidence whether it's MGM from HBO Max or Disney now. This is their last one that there really isn't that market for premium video on demand. So I think first of all we challenged that proposition. But as we talked about, we have some of the best of the best theaters out there. And therefore, again, we think our theaters are going to perform even in if box office ends up normalizing to a lower level. There maybe some of that lower half of the country theaters that close and we'll have to see how that redirects the consumer. I mean, we could come out of this even on a lower box office with the exact same coverages, because those consumers are redirected into our surviving theaters. But what -- and the reason that we kind of gave you kind of the information we did today is to talk about the productivity of our theaters and how well they're -- how confident we are that they're going to sustain and be a part of any solution involving theatrical exhibition as we go forward. Mark Peterson: Hey, John. I just want to say one thing. I was saying 95% to 97% for revenue recognition, where it's 95% to 99%. My comments still hold what I said, but you're right, it is 95% to 99%. So we're approaching 100%. There's still some deferral into Q4. It fully normalizes next year. But the high end is 99% for rev rec, you're right. John Massocca: Understood. And then this quick one on -- follow-up, the last question. Do you have any visibility into the theater portfolios coverages today kind of broader coverage today or ability to cover now that we kind of have a pretty much fully open portfolio? Mark Peterson: Again, it's very difficult to look at today. I think again, if you just look at kind of a big picture item. If you look at -- and I'll let Greg to comment on this. If you think about 2019 being kind of a $11.5 billion, $12 billion, 11.9. Greg Silvers: 11.3. Mark Peterson: 11.3 sorry. 11.3 number and you think we were around the 20 and you've got is, he said, a $500 million month. If you project $500 million months on a standardized basis you get back close to those kind of numbers. So now, the reality is not all months are equal, but we are at or approaching a run rate to where the theaters are cash flow neutral to beginning to be cash flow positive on a per unit basis. John Massocca: Okay. Very helpful. That's it for me. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Greg Silvers: Thanks John. Operator: I am showing no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back to the speakers for closing remarks. Greg Silvers: Thank you, Whitney, and thank you all for joining us today. And we look forward to talking to you at our third quarter call. Thanks everyone. Thank you. Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.
EPR Ratings Summary
EPR Quant Ranking
Related Analysis

EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) Showcases Strong Performance and Strategic Planning at Citi 2025 Global Property CEO Conference

  • EPR Properties reported earnings per share of $1.22, significantly beating the estimated $0.66, highlighting its effective management and strategic planning.
  • The company's revenue reached $164.04 million, surpassing the estimated $161.25 million, reflecting its ability to capitalize on market opportunities.
  • EPR's stock price increased to $53.07, indicating active trading interest and showcasing its resilience and growth potential in the market.

EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that focuses on properties in the entertainment, recreation, and education sectors. The company is set to present at the Citi 2025 Global Property CEO Conference, a key event for showcasing its strategies and performance. This conference gathers industry leaders to discuss market trends and investment opportunities.

EPR's recent financial performance highlights its strong position in the real estate sector. On February 26, 2025, EPR reported earnings per share of $1.22, significantly surpassing the estimated $0.66. This impressive performance demonstrates EPR's effective management and strategic planning, which it will likely emphasize at the conference.

The company's revenue also exceeded expectations, reaching $164.04 million compared to the estimated $161.25 million. This revenue growth reflects EPR's ability to capitalize on market opportunities and maintain a robust portfolio. Such financial achievements are crucial talking points for EPR as it engages with investors and industry leaders at the conference.

EPR's stock is currently priced at $53.07, showing a 1.82% increase with a $0.95 rise. The stock's fluctuation between $51.59 and $53.11 today indicates active trading interest. Over the past year, EPR's stock has ranged from a low of $39.66 to a high of $53.59, showcasing its resilience and growth potential in the market.

With a market capitalization of approximately $4.04 billion and a trading volume of 1,142,337 shares, EPR Properties is a significant player in the real estate sector. Its participation in the Citi 2025 Global Property CEO Conference underscores its commitment to transparency and leadership, reinforcing its engagement with the investment community.

EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) Showcases Strong Performance and Strategic Planning at Citi 2025 Global Property CEO Conference

  • EPR Properties reported earnings per share of $1.22, significantly beating the estimated $0.66, highlighting its effective management and strategic planning.
  • The company's revenue reached $164.04 million, surpassing the estimated $161.25 million, reflecting its ability to capitalize on market opportunities.
  • EPR's stock price increased to $53.07, indicating active trading interest and showcasing its resilience and growth potential in the market.

EPR Properties (NYSE:EPR) is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that focuses on properties in the entertainment, recreation, and education sectors. The company is set to present at the Citi 2025 Global Property CEO Conference, a key event for showcasing its strategies and performance. This conference gathers industry leaders to discuss market trends and investment opportunities.

EPR's recent financial performance highlights its strong position in the real estate sector. On February 26, 2025, EPR reported earnings per share of $1.22, significantly surpassing the estimated $0.66. This impressive performance demonstrates EPR's effective management and strategic planning, which it will likely emphasize at the conference.

The company's revenue also exceeded expectations, reaching $164.04 million compared to the estimated $161.25 million. This revenue growth reflects EPR's ability to capitalize on market opportunities and maintain a robust portfolio. Such financial achievements are crucial talking points for EPR as it engages with investors and industry leaders at the conference.

EPR's stock is currently priced at $53.07, showing a 1.82% increase with a $0.95 rise. The stock's fluctuation between $51.59 and $53.11 today indicates active trading interest. Over the past year, EPR's stock has ranged from a low of $39.66 to a high of $53.59, showcasing its resilience and growth potential in the market.

With a market capitalization of approximately $4.04 billion and a trading volume of 1,142,337 shares, EPR Properties is a significant player in the real estate sector. Its participation in the Citi 2025 Global Property CEO Conference underscores its commitment to transparency and leadership, reinforcing its engagement with the investment community.