Energizer Holdings, Inc. (ENR) on Q2 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript

Operator: Good morning, my name is Mike, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Energizer's Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2021 Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Ms. Jackie Burwitz, Vice President, Investor Relations. Ms. Burwitz, the floor is yours, ma'am. Jackie Burwitz: Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Energizer's second quarter fiscal 2021 conference call. Joining me today on the call are Mark LaVigne, President and Chief Executive Officer; Tim Gorman, Chief Financial Officer; and John Drabik, our Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. A replay of this call will be available on the Investor Relations section of our website, energizerholdings.com. In addition, a slide deck providing detailed financial results for the quarter is also posted on our website. Mark LaVigne: Thanks, Jackie, and good morning, everyone. Today, I am pleased to share our second quarter 2021 results, which build on the momentum from our first quarter as we benefited from elevated demand, expanded distribution and strong execution, all of which led to robust earnings growth. As we look specifically at the results for the quarter, we maintained top line momentum with organic sales of 12.7% with strong sales across categories and markets around the globe. We were able to meet that demand while also demonstrating improved cost control and delivering synergies, which partially offset the inflationary headwinds from transportation, tariffs and product input costs. Our adjusted earnings per share were $0.77, more than double the prior-year, driven by strong organic sales growth, synergy realization, favorable currencies and lower interest expense. Given our performance in the first half, we are increasing our full fiscal year outlook to the following. Net sales growth to 5% to 7% adjusted earnings per share to a new range of $3.30 to $3.50 and adjusted EBITDA to a new range of $620 million to $640 million. Tim will provide more information on both the quarterly results and the revised outlook in a moment. Timothy Gorman: Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. In addition to the earnings release we issued this morning, a slide deck included on our website highlights additional key financial metrics. As Mark touched on, as we crossed the halfway mark for the fiscal year, we are pleased with our continued momentum. Our organic revenue growth of 12.7% combined with synergy realization, cost controls, lower interest expense and favorable currency headwinds resulted in strong adjusted earnings per share of $0.77, up more than double the prior-year second quarter and adjusted EBITDA of $148 million, up 20% compared to the prior year. Taking a deeper look at the organic revenue growth. We maintained our top line momentum with strong sales across all of our categories and geographies. Both of our segments showed organic growth with the Americas up nearly 16% and International up 6%, and our Battery and Auto Care businesses grew benefiting from elevated demand and distribution gains that began last summer. Adjusted gross margin decreased 110 basis points versus the prior year to 40.5% in line with our adjusted gross margin reported in the first quarter. This was impacted primarily by increased operating costs that resulted from higher tariffs associated with source product to meet elevated demand, transportation, labor and product input cost, all consistent with inflationary trends in the global market. Additionally, our gross margin was negatively impacted by the lower margin profile associated with recent distribution gains and acquisitions, synergies of $14.2 million and favorable impacts from currency exchange rates partially offset these negative impacts. As Mark mentioned, we do expect inflationary headwinds over the balance of the current year and into next year. At the present time, we are essentially fully hedged on a commodity costs for fiscal year 2021. Looking beyond this year, we will continue to take actions to offset the impact of these headwinds through continuous improvement efforts and pricing actions. A&P as a percent of sales was 4% relatively flat compared with the prior year's second quarter. Consistent with our priorities, we invested on an absolute dollar basis in A&P to support our brands and innovation with total A&P spending of $4 million or 19% over the prior year. Excluding acquisition and integration costs, SG&A as a percent of net sales was 16.7% versus 18.4% in the prior year, primarily the result of elevated sales experienced in the current year. On an absolute dollar basis, adjusted SG&A increased $6 million in part because of the higher overheads associated with our top line sales growth and foreign exchange rate impacts. Mark LaVigne: Thank you, Tim. We have had a great first half of fiscal 2021, which is a testament to the efforts of our colleagues around the world to make, ship and deliver the products that our consumers need during this time. We are focused on winning the day by staying focused on the consumer and delivering for our customers, all while building the foundation to win in the future. With that, I will open the call for questions. Operator: And the first question we have will come from Bill Chappell of Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Bill Chappell: Just first question - just maybe talk a little bit more on gross margin and your commodity kind of outlook. I guess one, what - where are you in terms of hedging into fiscal '22, I know you do more than four, five months out. So I imagine you're in decent shape? And then second, maybe give us some more examples or more color on what you're doing in terms of revenue management pricing on the battery side. Appreciate the commentary on AutoCare, but I assume you - I don't know if you're looking at price increases or just the timing on promotions. Just any color there would be great? Mark LaVigne: Sure, Bill. Why don't I start with the second question and then I'll have John cover the gross margin impacts in Q2 and as well as the bridge for the balance of the year. When we analyzed gross margin headwinds and the levers that we're going to pull in order to address them, we really focused on four buckets, and first and foremost, the first thing we need to do is make sure that we've done everything we can do internally to control our costs, that's something that we do exceptionally well and it's an ongoing discipline that we need to make sure that we continue to activate to ensure we've done everything we can to control the costs within our four walls. On mix management, we've proactively managed brands, pack sizes assortment across channels, across customers to drive margin improvement, so that's an ongoing discipline. We have dedicated teams who do that on a daily basis. And then in promotional activity, we look at - we look hard at the depth and frequency of promotion, again that's something we do day in day out, anyway. But when you're facing inflationary headwinds that filter needs to be a little bit tighter and that's something that we've begun to implement over the last couple of quarters is tighter promotional activity. And then really finally once you've optimized those, we'll take a look at pricing actions like we did in AutoCare this past quarter. And as you've heard in the past, we base that on a number of factors; inflationary headwinds, currencies, what's the market dynamic innovation, investments and we'll continue to do that. During the first part of this fiscal year, we have seen inflationary pressures and we anticipate that they're going to continue for the balance of the year. We've been able to mitigate those really through proactive management of all the areas that I just mentioned. We also have the benefit of synergies, and as you mentioned, we also have a hedging program which helps us smooth out some of the impacts that we feel and gives us a forward look so that we can take these headwinds into account as we're planning all of those activities. John, why don't you cover kind of the bridge on gross margin. John Drabik: Yes, sure. And maybe to the first question on hedging. So we're fully hedged for commodities for the rest of '21 and we're about 25% hedged for '22. This quarter, we did see about 310 basis points of incremental and put Boston as you mentioned, Mark, it was really tariffs related to sourcing more product from China to meet that elevated demand. Increased transportation costs, half of that that we've seen is really related to increased volumes, but we've also seen increased freight rates. And then higher labor rates in a number of our production locations, especially in North America. So we have seen higher commodity spot rates, but as we've discussed, we are fully hedged for this year. So the impact this quarter was modest. As we look at the back half of the year, we're calling for gross margin and do relatively flat with the first half, and that's despite $25 million to $35 million of incremental costs. Driven by the same issues such as tariffs, freight and labor as well as we're seeing about 25% of that amount due to commodity inflation. More than offsetting those costs for the rest of the year will be about $10 million to $15 million of incremental synergies and roughly $29 million of one-time COVID costs that we've incurred last year but don't expect to repeat this year. Operator: Next, we have Dara Mohsenian of Morgan Stanley. Dara Mohsenian: So two questions. First, just on the battery side, thinking about category trends going forward, can you give us a bit of detail on what you're assuming per category growth in the back half of fiscal year and batteries? I'm just wondering how much of that halo of the higher devices per household as well as greater usage in the household. Are you assuming that fully dissipates, mostly dissipates, how would you characterize that? And then also just longer term thoughts on the sustainability of this higher category volume as you look out over the next couple of years, so a longer-term look at that also? Thanks. Mark LaVigne: Yes, I think over the next four quarters, it's likely that we're going to see or we do have some tough comps over the next four quarters because of the elevated demand, but I think let me take the longer-term view today. I think that's more important and we feel like we're extremely well positioned coming out of the pandemic. There's no doubt we're going to have some tough comps that we're going to have to cycle through, but that really doesn't dampen our enthusiasm at all for how we're feeling about the battery category at the moment. And let me explain why? Consumers are in a different place coming out of the pandemic than that - where they were going in and a lot of the habits that they've implemented are going to have some staying power. And if you look at some of the consumer data that we've seen, consumers that we mentioned in the prepared remarks have purchased more devices. In the U.S., the number of battery power devices has increased roughly mid-single digits for the households in 2020 and that equates to roughly about 1.5 devices more per household than what they had previously. Also encouraging is that they're using those devices more and their purchase frequency is up 6% versus the prior year, and when they do buy, they are buying more, that's up 10%. All of those factors are driving very healthy category dynamics at the moment. And it's not pantry loading, the consumer research that we've engaged in tells us that 90% of consumers who are buying batteries today are buying them for immediate use. So they're not stepping their pantries and we're going to have a big loads, roughly a third of those consumers expect to continue to use more batteries in the future than they have in the past. And what you're seeing is it's really playing out in the data. I mean the three month period for the end of February, the category was up globally 14% with Energizer up 20%. And then if you look at more recent four-week data which has negative category trends, but what I would say is, if you look at sort of the April data of 2019 to 2021, the category is up nearly 16% with Energizer up 18%. So there's a lot of noise in the numbers, if you are going to have to deal with comps against some extreme demand, but we believe coming out of the pandemic, it's going to be a very healthy category. And I think what we want to do is, see some of these trends continue to have the same power that we believe they do and I think at that point that would be an appropriate time for us to take a look at our long-term growth expectations for the category, but we like what we're seeing so far. Dara Mohsenian: And if I could just follow up on Bill's question on pricing. In AutoCare, can you give us a sense of what percent of the portfolio you're taking pricing up a bit better sense for magnitude and just help me understand the decision to take pricing there versus not announcing anything in terms of price increases in batteries. Obviously, very different commodities underlying that, but just help me sort of understand that decision conceptually? Thanks. Mark LaVigne: Yes, there you pointed to a couple of the factors right there in your question. One is, we don't have the hedging benefits in auto that we do in batteries, you also have some seasonality in the business, which made the timing of it a little more critical than it is in some of our other categories. And then in terms of the price increase itself, we don't speak publicly about the level of percentage increases, it was broad based across the category, and certainly, we always look to offset the inflationary headwinds that we're experiencing from the input cost perspective. Operator: Next, we have Lauren Lieberman of Barclays. Lauren Lieberman: First thing I want to ask about was just the way that you talked about the cost inflation, not being transitory. I understand that, obviously, the current inflationary picture on inputs. But I was curious if there was something embedded in there on your overall global supply chain just knowing some of the elevated costs that you experienced over the last 12 months, the degree to which that's being baked in is being not transitory if we're really talking about more the current inflation that we're all reading about day to day? Thanks. Mark LaVigne: It's nothing more to read into that other than I think current inflation that we're all reading about day to day. Lauren Lieberman: Good, simple answer. And then I was looking for also an update on AutoCare innovation. I think this is the time when sort of the Energizer owned pipeline would start coming to market. So I was curious if you could talk a little bit about that or if any of that activity has been slowed down or delayed until next year, just given COVID and overall mobility trends or if some of that's been launching in and what the read has been from retailers? Mark LaVigne: I'm very excited about the innovation we have showing up in stores. Not, we haven't slowed anything down based on the pandemic, in fact, we spent several things up, you've seen a disinfectant product that we were able to launch in very rapid timeframe for the Armor All products as well as we've also introduced ceramic products which you're going to see more broadly in the market today. Early days in the AutoCare season right now, so I wouldn't want to declare a victory at the moment but very promising. What we've seen in the latest four weeks, it's a period pending the end of April, value for the category was up nearly 31% with Energizer, nearly 35% if you look at that on a two-year basis versus the same time period in '19 it's up 7.5% in the category with Energizer up 15%, very healthy growth, very helpful. Right now, we're going to have to cycle through a period of time when particularly the auto retailers were shut down. So you're going to see some category data that's going to look really healthy based on that experience last spring. But as of now, again, early in the season, but very promising results. We have seen in the latest data that we have four of the top - four of eight top growing SKUs out there with wipes and some of our upholstery cleaner, wheel cleaner and very excited about what AutoCare has to bring. Operator: The next question we have comes from Nik Modi of RBC Capital Markets. Actually, I do apologize. It looks like that questionnaire moved on. So we will go ahead to Rob Ottenstein of Evercore. Please go ahead, sir. Rob Ottenstein: Great. Thank you very much. Couple of questions. First on batteries, can you talk a little bit about the new distribution that you're getting and why that's lower margin? And then moving over on the automotive side, International was very strong, any more details there and in general on the automotive side, if you had talked a year or so ago that the brands were somewhat under invested in, where are you in terms of building the brand equity on the auto side? Thank you. Mark LaVigne: On the battery side, from the distribution standpoint, we were talking about that for a great deal of last fiscal year and that was really broad based distribution gains. You saw expanded space in maps. We had improved presence online, home center. We were able to get back into the club channel and that may have been driving some of the margin headwinds that you're referring to. Similar story in AutoCare where we've been able to expand both in auto retailers get additional space, improved presence online as well as in home center, we've been able to launch some distribution at home center where the AutoCare business wasn't previously. International off a low base, but impressive growth rates, seeing some wins in Australia and Mexico as well as some nice wins in the European markets with our fragrance business. We've invested in the brands, both from advertising and A&P perspective, we've launched new creative but we've - most importantly, we've been able to really rejuvenate that innovation pipeline. And so what we're able to go and present to retailers is as strong as it's ever been. Operator: Next we have Nik Modi of RBC Capital Markets. Nik Modi: Good morning, everyone. Just wanted to follow up on the last question that Robert just asked about distribution gains. I mean it's been many, many years and it's been very good almost every year, you guys have been a separate company from Edgewell? And I'm just curious, how should we think about the runway of further distribution gains, like how do we - is there any way to quantify it, anyway to provide a framework and how we should think about it? Mark LaVigne: This is something that the team's constantly battle day in day out for. But we're constantly looking for additional space, expanded space, more preferential space across all of our categories for the balance of '21, while we're going to cycle off some of the big distribution gains and so you'll see the new distribution taper off because of some of the bills and big distribution, particularly in club that we were able to gain last year, those are going to start to taper off in the June, July timeframe. But for the balance of the year, distribution continues to be a tailwind for us. I think it's going to have a positive impact all the way through September. Nik Modi: And just thinking about it longer term, are there certain channels or certain geographies where you still believe way under index relative to where you should be? Timothy Gorman: That's going to differ market to market around the world that, we'll analyze our footprint in the U.S., obviously, we have fairly mature and robust distribution, but there is always an opportunity for us to get more space or new space, we have to do it the right way, and we have to invest and drive the category growth for the retailers and allow our brands to carry the day while doing that. But it isn't a discipline that we ever pull the throttle back, we're going to continue to fight for more. And right now, what you're seeing, is a really a renewed emphasis across the board both on pure play digital as well as omnichannel and that's going to be an area of significant investment and we would expect significant growth over the next couple of years. Operator: Next, we have Kevin Grundy of Jefferies. Kevin Grundy: Morning everyone. Couple of questions if I could, first one for Tim and second one for Mark. Tim, with respect to cost synergies and productivity, clearly a heightened emphasis here, I guess, given the commodity cost environment and the company has done a good job with cost synergies exceeding the initial target. Can you talk about other areas of opportunity where you're particularly focused right now as an organization and how large that opportunity can be as we sort of think about profitability, not just this year but into next? And then for Mark, I know that there is a limitation with the online data, can you just - but given the importance in the growth that the category you're seeing, can you give us perhaps even a little bit more color to the extent that you have it around industry growth around how your share trends are holding up particularly relative to Amazon Basics and Duracell? So that would be appreciated. Thank you, both. Timothy Gorman: Yes, Kevin. Relative to synergies and continuous improvement. As you know, before the Battery and AutoCare acquisitions, we've always been focused on continuous improvement. As you indicated, we have over-delivered on the synergy expectations that we had for Battery and AutoCare and that will continue through the balance of this year. And then as we move into next year, we continue to see areas for improvement in our global product supply chain to take out costs and as Mark had indicated, as we go up against these inflationary pressures, that's the first thing that we're going to look to do is to offset those costs and then as necessary take any pricing actions that we deem appropriate. So it's both in cost as well as overhead. So as we look to make investments in technology that also will provide an opportunity for us as we move forward. Mark LaVigne: And Kevin, I know on the e-commerce front, it's important. And in the past, we've provided the category information, but we're just not receiving that information and many of the retailers are not providing it. So we're a little bit unable to do that with any degree of precision. So what we can provide you, and we mentioned in the prepared remarks or what our sales are doing online, we talked about roughly a 70% growth rate, I would say, Battery's a little bit higher than that, AutoCare a little bit lower than that and our Lights business is right around there. So healthy growth what we're seeing online. We have no reason to believe based on - are the insights we're able to gather that on the battery side that - our share position has meaningfully changed from where it was, but again that's more of a more of an opinion, I think than it is based on a database factual information, which we used to get. I would say, we're holding our own, you're continuing to see the consolidation online if that was trending for the last year or so. AutoCare we have - we also believe that we're trending ahead of category growth rates and are gaining share and we hope that the information starts to flow from those data sources and as soon as they do we can provide an updated category information. Operator: Next, we have Andrea Teixeira of JPMorgan. Andrea Teixeira: Thank you, good morning. And just going back to that puts and takes that lead to your flat second half fiscal year's guidance at the high-end, you lap of course tough comparisons in the U.S., but you eased there internationally. So you mentioned some of the gains in AutoCare abroad, so can you please elaborate more impact on batteries internationally, how are you tracking there? And also as a follow-up on your e-commerce growth that you just mentioned now, are you seeing International e-commerce in the same pace or even accelerating given that it's relatively lower penetration? Thanks. Mark LaVigne: On the last question there, Andrea, I think it's - the growth is more robust Internationally just because it's off of a lower base, but we are seeing nice growth in our International markets where we are taking our efforts in the U.S. and applying to them to international markets. In terms of the International markets on the battery side, we've seen in the latest three months the category continues to respond very well. We're in markets like France, you're up nearly 11% and this is through February '21. Australia, which has been one of the first markets that I think has been on the other side of the pandemic, up 7% and then a market like Germany 18.5%. So the battery category internationally is healthy as well and we're seeing those results in our business as well. Andrea Teixeira: And since - that's super helpful. And since you've seen places, where consumers have - the reopening has been ahead of us, is there any earlier read on how consumption habits may have changed? Mark LaVigne: It's an interesting read and it's something that we're watching as you've got markets like Australia and New Zealand. We were coming out of the pandemic a little bit earlier and we certainly had some markets around the world where we are - where they are right in the middle of it. And so we are watching that. We're watching the consumer information, the PLF data and the category data out of those markets to see if there's any leading indications. Leading indications that we have thus far coming out of markets like Australia, New Zealand is there is some staying power to the health of the categories that we're in. We expect that to continue, and we're going to lean into it. Operator: Next, we have Jason English of Goldman Sachs. Jason English: Congrats on a really a very strong quarter. Mark LaVigne: Thank you. Jason English: Couple of quick questions. Thank you for the slightly different bridges this quarter in terms of how you build out on EBITDA, et cetera. Looking at the organic drop through, organic sales growth of $75 million, but leading to only $9.5 million of EBITDA with variable margin at 12.7%. It struck me as very low, can you give us some context around why that flow-through is not more robust? Mark LaVigne: John. John Drabik: Yes. So look, we expect the full year and second half improvement EBITDA and EPS to really be driven by a couple of things; strong operating performance, synergy realization of $50 million to $55 million and we've got some positive currency impacts as well as we're comping the $29 million of COVID costs. Offsetting that, some of the things that you're seeing are incremental SG&A that's related to the sales volumes sort of like we saw in this quarter. We're doing some additional investment in A&P as well. And so you are seeing slightly less EBITDA accretion relative to the sales growth. Jason English: Okay. And investors we talk with, they continuously kind of come back with one key question that is whether or not your hedges, your hedge cost is materially below the spot rates out there and whether we should be expecting a bit of a cost cliff as we roll into next year. Is there any context or color you can give to either validate or ease those concerns? John Drabik: Yes, Jason. I mean we did call out. So if you look at this quarter of $16 million in incremental costs. For the nine months, we're talking about $40 million to $50 million of incremental and that's related to the tariffs, transportation and labor as well as a little bit of commodities, about 15% of those commodities that were 100% fixed. So we're rolling into some of those higher costs, but not as big an impact in 2021. We will see those hedges start to roll off, and so as we get out - further out, you'll start to see some inflation come through on the commodity side as well. So as we look at our top four commodities and those account for about 15% of our COGS. We're seeing spot prices relative to our average cost in '21, up 15% to 20%. So that's a bit of the inflation that we're seeing come through and our expectation is that we're going to address those through continuous improvement efforts to take cost out, as Tim mentioned, as well as some of the revenue management that Mark has talked. Operator: So next we have William Reuter of Bank of America. William Reuter: So I know you were not interested in sharing the details of the percentage price increases in auto, but were the price increases you push through enough to offset the raw materials and was this on a dollar for dollar basis or on a margin basis? Mark LaVigne: The price increases we pushed through were sufficient to offset the inflationary pressures we are experiencing on auto. William Reuter: Okay. And then my second question with regard to pushing through additional price increases in battery, I guess how frequently are mid-season price increases push through on battery do you typically wait for more of a larger discussion around shelf space resets to push those through? Mark LaVigne: We'll do as we pull together the information and what we've done in the past. When we are experiencing headwinds in transportation, labor, tariffs and commodities like we are now, we go through those exercises, internal costs, revenue management activities and then as a last resort, move on to pricing. There is no, I think what we have to do is have enough of a handle on the permanency, the impact and have enough data to be able to book to come and go into customers and have a fact based discussion about pressures that we're feeling and whenever that time is in the cycle, it's the right time to have that. And as soon as we have that information pull together, feel like we have a fulsome story to a percent and justify a price increase. That's when we're going to go in, so there is no sort of magic window of when we'll go in or when we won't. We're just going to do it when we feel like we have all the facts to justify it and had that discussion. And that's the way we've approached it in the past and I would expect that the labor and approaches in the future as well. Operator: Well, at this time, I'm showing no further questions. We'll go ahead and conclude our question and answer session. I would now like to turn the conference call back over to Mr. Mark LaVigne for any closing remarks. Sir? Mark LaVigne: Thanks, everyone, for your time and for joining us today and your ongoing interest in Energizer. Operator: All right. And we thank you also sir and to the rest of the management team for your time also. Again the conference call has now concluded. At this time, you may disconnect your lines. Everyone, take care and have a wonderful day.
ENR Ratings Summary
ENR Quant Ranking
Related Analysis

Energizer Stock Plunges 8% Following Several Downgrades

Shares of Energizer (NYSE:ENR), the well-known battery manufacturer, experienced an 8% drop intra-day today, following downgrades by several brokerage firms.

Morgan Stanley downgraded Energizer's rating to Underweight. The firm cited concerns about "lower visibility" and increasing risks to the company's revenue. The analysts also expressed doubts about Energizer's ability to grow its organic sales growth over time. They pointed out potential challenges in maintaining pricing power in the battery sector and the risk of declining consumer demand in some of Energizer's semi-discretionary product categories compared to its consumer packaged goods (CPG) peers.

Meanwhile, RBC Capital Markets described Energizer's financial year 2024 guidance as "tepid." The analysts adjusted the firm's stance on Energizer to Sector Perform from Outperform, setting a price target of $38 per share. The analysts’ rationale for the downgrade was based on combining the company's new, lower earnings estimates with the recent rally in its stock price, leading to the conclusion that the stock is now approximating fair value.

These downgrades and cautious outlooks came after Energizer issued full-year adjusted earnings per share guidance that fell below the consensus expectations of Wall Street analysts.

Energizer Stock Plunges 8% Following Several Downgrades

Shares of Energizer (NYSE:ENR), the well-known battery manufacturer, experienced an 8% drop intra-day today, following downgrades by several brokerage firms.

Morgan Stanley downgraded Energizer's rating to Underweight. The firm cited concerns about "lower visibility" and increasing risks to the company's revenue. The analysts also expressed doubts about Energizer's ability to grow its organic sales growth over time. They pointed out potential challenges in maintaining pricing power in the battery sector and the risk of declining consumer demand in some of Energizer's semi-discretionary product categories compared to its consumer packaged goods (CPG) peers.

Meanwhile, RBC Capital Markets described Energizer's financial year 2024 guidance as "tepid." The analysts adjusted the firm's stance on Energizer to Sector Perform from Outperform, setting a price target of $38 per share. The analysts’ rationale for the downgrade was based on combining the company's new, lower earnings estimates with the recent rally in its stock price, leading to the conclusion that the stock is now approximating fair value.

These downgrades and cautious outlooks came after Energizer issued full-year adjusted earnings per share guidance that fell below the consensus expectations of Wall Street analysts.

Energizer Holdings Shares Fall 5% on Q1 Miss

Energizer Holdings (NYSE:ENR) shares plunged nearly 5% yesterday after the company reported its Q1 results, with EPS coming in at $0.72, missing the Street estimate of $0.77. Revenue was $765.1 million, worse than the Street estimate of $789.38 million.

Organic growth was (5.4%), missing the Street expectations of (1.8%). Auto Care posted organic growth of (10.2%), notably below the Street estimate of (2.9%).

Despite a softer-than-expected topline, gross margin performance was strong, growing 150 bps year-over-year and coming in 150 bps ahead of consensus expectations. The expansion was driven by pricing initiatives, $6.5 million in savings from Project Momentum, and an accretive impact from exiting a lower margin business, but was offset by higher material and ocean freight costs and FX impact.