Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) on Q1 2021 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Curtiss-Wright First Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Jim Ryan, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Jim Ryan: Thank you, Dana, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Curtiss-Wright's First Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me on the call today are President and Chief Executive Officer, Lynn Bamford; and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chris Farkas. Our call today is being webcast and the press release as well as a copy of today's financial presentation is available for download through the Investor Relations section of our company website at www.curtisswright.com.
Lynn Bamford: Thank you, Jim, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin with the key highlights of the first quarter performance and an overview of our full year 2021 outlook. Then I'll turn the call over to Chris to provide a more detailed review of our financial results and an update to our full year guidance. Finally, I'll wrap up our prepared remarks before we move to Q&A. Starting with the first quarter highlights. We're off to a great start with higher sales and improved profitability, driven by strong operational performance that exceeded our expectations. The net sales increase of 2% was led by solid growth in our aerospace and defense markets, which improved 8%. The adjusted operating income improved 15%, while adjusted operating margin increased 160 basis points, reflecting strong margin improvement in the Defense Electronics and Naval and Power segments. Our results also reflected our swift actions taken last year in response to the pandemic, where we committed to controlling our cost to preserve profitability and free cash flow.
Chris Farkas: Thank you, Lynn, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin today with a review of our first quarter sales and profitability where we again delivered another strong operational performance. Starting in the Aerospace and Industrial segment, sales were lower year-over-year, as anticipated, based upon reduced demand on wide-body jets within the commercial aerospace market. However, on a positive note, we experienced an uplift in industrial vehicle product sales to both on- and off-highway markets driven by solid order growth, as Lynn mentioned earlier.
Lynn Bamford: Thank you, Chris. In summary, we expect to deliver strong results in 2021. We are well positioned to deliver a high single-digit growth rate in sales and double-digit growth in operating income and diluted EPS in 2021, while continuing to expand our margins to reach 17% in 2022. We expect to accomplish these results while making an additional $10 million of strategic investment in R&D to fuel future organic growth. Our adjusted free cash flow remains strong as we expect to generate north of 110% free cash flow conversion. We also continue to maintain a healthy and balanced capital allocation strategy to support our top and bottom line growth. Our balance sheet remains very strong, and we have sufficient capacity to spend up to $1.6 billion in strategic acquisitions. Of course, should acquisitions not transpire as expected, then we will consider additional share repurchase activity as we have done historically to ensure maximum return to our shareholders. Later this month, on the morning of May 26, we will be conducting our virtual Investor Day event. During the event, we will share Curtiss-Wright's new vision and pivot to growth strategy driven by a renewed focus on top line acceleration. We will provide an overview of our new operating growth plan, led by our continued focus on operational excellence as well as a deeper dive into the segments where we have tremendous potential to leverage technological leadership across the corporation. As we will demonstrate, we continue to build upon the company's strong foundation and decades of engineering expertise through ongoing innovation and collaboration. This, in turn, drives our continued strategic investments. We will conclude the day by delivering our new three year targets building upon our top quartile performance while driving solid growth in operating income, EPS and free cash flow. We hope that you will join us in a few weeks as we reinforce Curtiss-Wright's strong culture of innovation, proven operational excellence and dedication to delivering long-term value for our stakeholders. At this time, I would like to open up today's call for questions.
Operator: And our first question comes from the line of Mike Ciarmoli with Truist.
Mike Ciarmoli: Hey, good morning guys and thanks for picking the question. Nice results. Lynn or Chris, I mean, you mentioned supply chain various times throughout the prepared remarks. Can you just maybe give a little bit more color where specifically you're seeing the tightness? Is it at the printed circuit board, semiconductor level? And you mentioned some good pickup in on-road, off-road vehicles. Is there any concern on that side of the market regarding supply chain constraints? And then even dovetailing in there, maybe just what you're seeing on raw material and input prices as well as it relates to the whole supply chain?
Lynn Bamford: So I'll start off, and then I'll let Chris add some color to it. I think there's a couple -- we are seeing some impact from supply chain. It's nothing -- tightness and delays, nothing that's going to date. We don't feel it will impact us materially, but it's really something we're definitely focused on and keeping a close eye on. The areas where we're seeing some impact is a little bit of margin impact with increased freight costs. We're seeing some delays due to container shipments, specifically around the Los Angeles port. Again, these are all things we're managing. We work closely with our customers to make sure they understand where we're seeing delays and find mitigation approaches for them. But I'd say the one that's top of our list for paying attention to is electronic components. These obviously come into play for both our A&I segment, specifically for the vehicle programs and then obviously Defense Electronics. And we're really doing a lot of different things to drive -- to mitigate the risk in this area. We have long-standing relationships with our supply chains that we take advantage of. We dual source where we can. And then in some areas where we can use government priorities to expedite our electronics, we, for sure, take advantage of all those types of situations. So, at this point, we feel we have the situation under hand, but things can change. Those are the main areas where we're seeing delays, and we think we're managing them.
Chris Farkas: Yes. And I would only go on to add that a little bit of cost erosion, Mike, as you look at the Aerospace and Industrial group, but that's a pretty flexible and agile group and reacting to shifts in material cost and whether it's passing it on to the customer or kind of tightening the belt to kind of offset that, I think we've got that under control and in our guidance for the year. And on the defense side, it's really more about customers reacting, trying to pull in a little bit out of Q2 into Q1 to get ahead on this. But I think there it's more timing than anything, but Lynn said it well.
Mike Ciarmoli: Got it, perfect. And then, just one more bigger picture on the overall defense budget. Obviously, we've only seen the skinny version of the top line right now. But if you guys sort of size up the portfolio, any things kind of bubble into the surface area of risk, Joint Strike Fighter, any of your other platforms? And then we are also hearing that kind of -- if it is related to infrastructure investment, investing in the shipyards, and that seems to be a key priority of the Navy, which might have some positives for Dresser-Rand. But any comments on the overall trajectory of defense spending or programs?
Lynn Bamford: I would say, overall we feel pretty confident and remain pretty optimistic for our outlook and what we've -- the news coming through on what's expected when the President's budget is put forward, we think is going to very much support where we have our business. I mean I think it's pretty publicly spoken about that China is the pacing threat, which clearly ties right to ship building, which is the largest portion of our defense business, and we -- and lots of data points that we're picking up that there is clear bipartisan support for the shipbuilding industry. So, that is we don't see any disruption there. And again, I know I've mentioned it before, but the input we get from our customer base is a continuous challenge that we can ramp up. So, we see that as a good sign and some support for making some capital investments to be prepared for that ramp-up. So, all good news in that space. And again, I mean, if there's trimming of budget, all programs are subject to that. And so it's not as if we think there's no risk at all across the business, but we do know that places where we're heavily we have larger amounts of revenue are the top priorities. And specifically, when I think of PacStar, being our largest acquisition and wanting to make sure it performs to expectations, it continues. It had a great start to the year. Our outlook is optimistic, and it remains a high, high priority within the DoD. So, I don't want to be naive and say there's no risk. Clearly, we have an eye to it, but we really feel solid about where we have our programs. And I guess the one last comment I'd make is we've really taken a strategy in our defense electronics to be to really have state-of-the-art products that are kind of program-agnostic. And this press and adoption of the MOSA standard just continues. And we put out the press release on the F-22 adoption just as an example to really try and be more transparent about where we're winning business and why we're optimistic.
Mike Ciarmoli: Got it, very helpful. Thanks guys.
Lynn Bamford: Thanks, Mike.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Peter Arment with Baird.
Peter Arment: Hey good morning, and Lynn, Chris, Jim, nice quarter.
Christ Farkas: Thank you.
Peter Arment: So, commercial markets book-to-bill, 1.2. Maybe you could just -- if you could just give us a little more color on what you're seeing there and if you view it to be kind of sustainable or this is just an initial snapback in order activity?
Lynn Bamford: So, I'd say our most clear point of optimism and -- it's a fair question because as we've seen the orders pick up in the strong first quarter, whether it was just advance buying or something that's going to continue as a trend. And so that's definitely a question we've had for ourselves. We really do believe it is the beginning of a trend. And the uptick in the industrial on- and off-highway vehicles is just so encouraging. And we're here -- it's the orders that have been placed and the dialogues we're having with our customers that really lead us to believe that, that's going to continue on. In the commercial aerospace areas, our actuation and sensors are really getting signals that we're going to see a solid rebound in the second half of the year. And if there's any one area that we're still a little bit in a wait and see, it's around our surface tech business that they're kind of they don't being the short-cycled, you don't see the pickup as far in advance there. And so we're optimistic we're going to start seeing a little bit more there in the second half. It has picked up some, but it isn't quite as strong as we're seeing in the others. And Chris, I don't know if you'd want to add any color to that?
Chris Farkas: I think you said it well. I'd only go on to say, when you step, when you're looking at the commercial book-to-bill of 1.2 times, so it's not only the vehicle orders, but we have seen a steady sequential ramp in the process markets. Now they're not back to where they were in the prior year, but things are looking good from that perspective. And then as you look at nuclear within power and process and the nuclear aftermarket, they had a very good quarter here in the first quarter of '21 as well, not quite as great as where they were in Q1 of '20, but just continued sequential improvement, and they're on a strong ramp. And then when you do shift over to A&D and you look at commercial aerospace, just to reinforce what Lynn was saying about our long order cycle and short order cycle businesses, I mean we have been getting a lot of feedback from customers asking about rate readiness and expecting volumes to ramp in the second half. So, while we're looking at surface tech with some caution, given its short order cycle nature, I think it speaks favorably to support our full year guide and beyond.
Peter Arment: Yes. Chris, also, you mentioned in the power, like there were some reduced valves to the energy market kind of a little bit of a headwind. Do you just need CapEx spending to pick up there in order to see that recover as well?
Chris Farkas: I think it's a little bit of CapEx spending, but I also think it's really just timing and climbing back to pre-pandemic levels. If things are starting to open up here, we're starting to see improvements. And we're headed in a good direction here. I think it's really timing. We are expecting to see improvements here in the back half of the year. And the orders signals that we're getting in power and process support that.
Peter Arment: And then, just the last question on M&A. Lynn, just -- you mentioned kind of the significant capacity you have for M&A, but I think you guys have been very, very much focused on kind of adding in niche companies, niche technologies, and it sounds like that's still the focus. But where are you comfortable in terms of if it was the right fit taking leverage up to?
LynnBamford: So, I highlight that we have $1.6 billion of capacity because for a very specific strategic company that really added to our capabilities and build out on what we have to offer, I think we would go there and potentially beyond would be possible. So, you are right that we have historically added sub-$100 million companies. I think we showed our willingness to go beyond that with PacStar. And I would feel comfortable continuing on in that direction. And with that, I'll turn it over to Chris to talk a little bit more about the leverage.
Chris Farkas: Yes. I think from where we are from a debt-to-EBITDA standpoint at about 2.5 times, I mean we are within investment grade. We view investment grade to be in that three times or below level. And something transformational came along, and we felt it would be a good opportunity for us and our stakeholders and shareholders to get up to a 3.5 to four times. For the right property, we would do that. And I think we quickly used the cash to delever back down to investment grade. But we found our sweet spot right now, and I think we have great capacity.
Peter Arment: Nice results, thanks.
Chris Farkas: Thank you.
Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Myles Walton with UBS.
Myles Walton: Hey, good morning. I was hoping that maybe you can touch on the performance in the quarter, obviously better than you all had expected and by maybe $0.20 on the EPS, and you raised the full year by $0.10. Am I right to think that the comments about some of the prebuy, I guess, from 2Q into 1Q explains why the full beat versus the expectation maybe doesn't drop to the full year?
Chris Farkas: Yes, that is it, Myles. I think as you look at what we did here on the full year guidance and increasing the sales by $5 million in the Defense Electronics segment and $2 million of OI, we really had a much stronger pull from Q2 into Q1. So, that's really half of what I would say you're seeing above consensus. But the rest is just strength in orders and what we're seeing for that business for the remainder of the year. We're also we had some better restructuring savings in the Naval and Power segment, and that will translate to the full year. I think that was roughly $2 million as well. So, you're right on.
Lynn Bamford: Yes.
Myles Walton: Okay. And maybe on PacStar, it sounds like it's performing well. I think it was supposed to be dilutive to the segment margins, at least out of the gate. Is that the case? How dilutive -- or maybe just color on what the underlying business was even better on the margin side by how much?
Lynn Bamford: So, thanks for that. We are very encouraged at how things have performed with PacStar in Q1, the integration into the company, them leveraging. We definitely did talk about them being dilutive in year one, and I'll let Chris add some color to that, but we're well on the path toward leveraging our supply chain and channels to really help them drive their operating margins. And really, the pull for their products is quite outstanding, and we're very encouraged by what we see as an outlook for them.
Chris Farkas: And I'm not going to provide a lot of color on the dilution to PacStar's margins, but I will say that -- to Lynn's point, I mean, they are off to a good start, and we are very encouraged by how well the integration into our Defense Electronics segment is going. They will be dilutive to our full year margins, Curtiss-Wright overall margins this year. But we're going to bring them to 17% over time. So, they're going to be a contributor, and we like how things are going so far.
Myles Walton: Okay. Thanks, so much.
Chris Farkas: Thanks, Myles.
Lynn Bamford: Yes, thanks Myles.
Operator: Thank you and there are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to the President and Chief Executive Officer, Lynn Bamford.
Lynn Bamford: So everyone, thank you for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you again at our upcoming Investor Day event. Have a great day.
Operator: This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.
